Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kendoll"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Poe's Law)
(New section: The pictures)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
::::::::::Fair enough. Thanks for the info. [[User:Kallium|Kallium]][[User_Talk:Kallium|<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:39, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::::::::Fair enough. Thanks for the info. [[User:Kallium|Kallium]][[User_Talk:Kallium|<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:39, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::You're welcome.  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 20:42, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::You're welcome.  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 20:42, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== The pictures ==
 +
 +
Epic Phail!!! {{ken}} would never do something as aesthetically pleasing as to make all the pictures the same width, he like is miss-match of stupid, unfunny, unclever pictures with the stupid caption to be the original width of the picture regardless of how bad it looks. - [[User:3.14159|<font color="black">'''User'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:3.14159|<math>\approx</math>]][[Special:Contributions/3.14159|<math>\pi</math>]]{{User:3.14159/Sig/Shampoo}} 09:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:13, 10 October 2008

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Kendoll!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Très amusant, Mr Kendoll, sir. Welcome to the RationalWiki. weaseLOIdWeaselly.jpg~ 11:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

I look forward to February with some concern! Will my beliefs be challenged? Oh noes!--Bobbing up 11:08, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Still not learnt to get an edit right first time, eh, Ken? Silver Sloth 11:10, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Belif in evolution will end in Frebruary and the world will end in 2012. Well, really? Proxima Centauri 11:41, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Well, Kendol. How's Barbie?Barbara Shack 11:47, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Incidentally, and just for the record, let's have it one more time
The Truth is NOT a popularity contest
Silver Sloth 11:50, 9 October 2008 (EDT)


"See here for details." And they are... where?

Could you at least learn that modern evolutionary theory and Darwinism are not the same thing?!

If you want to criticize evolutionary theory, or any scientific idea, you need to use specifics, not a bunch of clever photo captions. And it would do you well to read up on what the theory actually says rather than relying entirely on straw-man arguments, because you have clearly demonstrated that you haven't the slightest understanding of what you are arguing against. It's like you're trying single-handedly to sue someone without any knowledge of the legal system- it gets you nowhere. Kalliumtalk 12:09, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Try reading Evolution and refuting what it says there. Proxima Centauri 12:13, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Regarding your picture of the Large Hadron Collider, which part of Conservapedia's God article addresses the Higgs boson? I was unable to locate that content. Please direct me to the appropriate section so that I may improve my knowledge of particle physics. Thanks. Kalliumtalk 12:16, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Gentlemen. You can rant and rave all you want, but you will find that my feelings towards Creationism and our Savior can best be summed up with this. Kendoll 12:17, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Does that mean that you plan to let those who believe that Jesus is the Savior down? Are you on our side? Proxima Centauri 12:52, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Very mature, Ken, but then rational debate never was a fundamentalist forte. You don't refute our points because you can't. That's why you have to resort to massaged Google rankings. Come on, Ken, try and persuade us - we'll listen and we won't even ban hammer you. Silver Sloth 12:32, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Quote; piccy; quote; vid; quote: have you ever had an ORIGINAL thought Ken baby? Or do you rely all the time on other's words to put your point. I've just been stalking "Kdbuffalo" around the web, is there anywhere you haven't been kicked out of for quote mining? SusanG  ContribsTalk 12:34, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Are we playing a game where we pretend this is real? Can I play? Okay...ahem, yes, well, KENservative, you are a bad man! Yes, uh...really...bad. Um...oh, oh, you're an evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet! How many points do I get? Are there points involved? --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 14:42, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
You get Failed to parse (PNG conversion failed; check for correct installation of latex and dvipng (or dvips + gs + convert)): 3+i/2 points. Closest one to Failed to parse (PNG conversion failed; check for correct installation of latex and dvipng (or dvips + gs + convert)): i wins.-- Antifly Now with 50% less retirement! 14:49, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Actually, it kinda looks like until recently Kendoll was scoring some fat Loki points. Smyth 14:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Poe's Law

Actually I thought this was joke page. Have I misunderstood? Is this yet another variant of Poe's Law?--Bobbing up 12:55, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

No way Ken would call himself "Kendoll". I believe your parody meter is functioning correctly, sir. Smyth 13:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
or rickroll us...-- Antifly Now with 50% less retirement! 13:04, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Have to agree, Ken's not on CP @ the moment so - probably AMES! SusanG  ContribsTalk 13:10, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Maybe firewedge?-- Antifly Now with 50% less retirement! 13:18, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Can someone find and compare their respective IP addresses (Conservative vs Kendoll)? That's beyond my know-how. Kalliumtalk 19:49, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Since we dumped checkuser it's beyond all of us. SusanG  ContribsTalk@~
I've no idea what that is, so forgive my ignorance, but can it be "undumped"? Assuming there aren't ethical reasons not to. Just curious. Kalliumtalk 20:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Checkuser is used to see the IP addresses a person has been using. It was abused (like so many other things) on Conservapedia, so as a statement of respect for users' privacy, we completely removed it from RationalWiki's copy of MediaWiki . We would never put it back for so flimsy a reason as checking to see if Kendoll is actually Conservative. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:27, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
Fair enough. Thanks for the info. Kalliumtalk 20:39, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
You're welcome. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:42, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

The pictures

Epic Phail!!! Ken would never do something as aesthetically pleasing as to make all the pictures the same width, he like is miss-match of stupid, unfunny, unclever pictures with the stupid caption to be the original width of the picture regardless of how bad it looks. - User \approx\piFor best results lather, rinse and repeat 09:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)