Difference between revisions of "User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Behold! A section that contains no text!: Oi! Don't ruin my inwisible text.)
(New section: Auld Nick's not dead!)
Line 287: Line 287:
 
::We've had it at talk category people.  RA is the only one who agrees with himself. We should have category:articles, too. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 20:05, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::We've had it at talk category people.  RA is the only one who agrees with himself. We should have category:articles, too. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 20:05, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:::I don't see why not.  I'll be the first to own up to the implications of my logic.  I won't even get in your way (unlike you with me).  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 20:08, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:::I don't see why not.  I'll be the first to own up to the implications of my logic.  I won't even get in your way (unlike you with me).  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 20:08, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Auld Nick's not dead! ==
 +
 +
<math>&#914;&cup;&#182;1&isin;R</math>
 +
I'm not dead I've just been busy with something else. [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 12:05, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:05, 15 September 2008

Le penseur.png
This user thinks these floating boxes are retarded.

Talk to me



Warning: This page may contain blasphemy.
You can help it by burning in Hades.

Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, (new)
See the history of vandalism to this article

Did you know?

That you and I are in a death match for fourth place on total RW contributions? tmtoulouse provoke 20:30, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

That so? Alas, for I can no longer maintain the edit rate I used to. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:03, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
6028 vs. 5888? Looks like there's a comfortable buffer between us  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:11, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
<eager>Where am I? Where am I??</eager> <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:24, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
You have... 3,551 edits. In only three months. Jesus Fucking Christ, Chaos... that's 1,180 edits a month. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:45, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
That's vaguely saddening :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:49, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
Cheer up, Chaos. You still pale in comparison to Human's amazing 2200 edits a month! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:53, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Stop working so hard

Makes lazy jellyfish look bad. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:36, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

But I'm must make up for lost time! And very soon, RA will be kicked off the computer, so I must be productive with what little time I have  : ( Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:41, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
Oh, all right. Th hug.gif <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:45, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
If I must, right?  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:46, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
It's a catchy (if slightly defeatist) phrase. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:47, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Epic phail

Your reworking of the essay template is a disaster on so many levels. First, you altered the arguments on a template we have been using for a long time. Second, you didn't consider the possibilities of how it is used and allow for them. Third, you implemented it and made a mess for no good reason. Please use the talk pages to discuss radical alterations of heavily used templates before changing them. I now request you to undo the changes you made (all of them!) and discuss them with "the rest of us" if you think they make so much sense. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Listless one?

Sorry just a little confused here --BoredCPer 00:07, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Well, your name does say you're bored, so I was just being playful  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:34, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks!

Thanks for the warm heart and the wide arms! --LArron 17:04, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

You're welcome, LArron! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:56, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Hello there!

Le penseur.png
This user thinks Chaos's new version of this template is neat.



Also...



Le penseur.png
This user thinks Radioactive Man probably won't agree... :(.
No, I do agree. A picture of The Thinker is much more relevant than the Wise and Mighty Cheesus. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:38, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
Aw. Thanks you.
I was going to make one that said "This user thinks RA did not royally fuck up the essay template" (adapted to fit your phrasing), but I have nowhere to put it, dammit. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 00:40, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Bunchanumbers

Set me in my place if I'm being presumptuous, but why do you greet every random IP that edits here? --CSimpacted with knowledge 04:09, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

It is part of my devious effort to spam my name as much as possible across the wiki, and preserve my spot in the top ten most linked pages. For a while, Bob M and I were even competing over our spot (he used to be lower-ranked than me). Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:13, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
But... I could beat you just by making a huge page full of my signature. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 04:25, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
Yes, for the about two minutes or so that it would remain in existence. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 04:40, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
If it lasted that long...--CSimpacted with knowledge 04:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
Creating a page full of your signature would count for 1 page link, Jellyfish. It counts the number of pages that link to another page, not the number of links per page. It that were the case, all bazillion of Human's signed comments would count, and goat would be somewhere around #30. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:56, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
Hmmph. Well in that case, I can't summon up much enthusiasm for this competition. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 05:18, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

How did you do the word change thingy?!

Thank you sir/madam or indeterminate species for the greetings...now if I can only figure out how to work this thing I'd be a happy aarvark. Mick McT 07:18, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Easy! It's a template—just type {{noun}} in a sentence and it'll randomly pick a noun off the list. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:37, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Death race

Told you. tmtoulouse provoke 14:07, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

You are a terrible person, you know that? Even I never rubbed my total edit count in anyone's faces. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:09, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
It says it in your signature. With an exclaimation mark. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 14:12, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Yes, but I never went up to anyone and said, "You know what? My edit count is about to surpass yours. Neener neener neener!" Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:20, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I suppose you have forgotten this email conversation?
RA 1
You know what? My edit count is about to surpass yours. Neener neener neener.
Chaos 1
Yes, wibble. What in God's name are you talking about?
RA 2
Merely that my edit count is about to surpass yours, O fruitcake person.
Chaos 2
My edit count has never been higher than yours.
RA 3
But that is why my victory is so delicious! :-p
Chaos 3
Who gave you this email address?
Let the record show that I am smug. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 14:32, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I must admit I'm not entirely convinced by this alleged primary source. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Your Historian Senses are malfunctioning. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 14:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Absurd. My Historian's senses are working at peak efficiency, a finely tuned instrument for protecting the innocent public against all sorts of deceptions and shenanigans. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:46, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Perhaps... you are TK! Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:48, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
LOL! What a sad little person you are to make such a sad little accusation, Ed. All the lurkers agree with me in pmail that I'm not TK. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:52, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh, how much do I miss TK! Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I haven't made up my mind yet: which one is a sock of TK, RA or Jellyfish? Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:36, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Aagh, you pulled a TK! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I didn't start using the phrase "neener neener neener" until just the other day. Also, I don't use the smiley " :-p ". So my point still stands. Neener neener neener! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I'm sure you have done at some point. I thought that was a pretty flawless imitation of you, actually. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 14:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
It is. Although I generally don't use a hyphen in my smiley faces, you got my personality spot on. Am I that predictable, or are you just good? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:43, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks! I'm just good :) Anyway, I can mimic you because I feel an affinity towards you <insert something less gooey here> <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 16:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Indeed, comrade, I feel the same way. Let us go forth and conquer, together! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
But what shall we conquer? The Farm belongs to Mr Jones and we could not run it on our own :o <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 21:39, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
We shall conquer the wiki! Join me, and together we can destroy the Emperor, and rule the wiki as father and son sysop plus one! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:58, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Or, you could attempt to start a new world order by cleansing society of evil, and simultaneously pretend to help me track you down and bring you to justice.
How could that go wrong? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:07, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
... I have no response to that. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:10, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Good. My L shrine needs dusting. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:13, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

Hmmph

You always stop talking first. It's a bad habit. And very impolite. I demands reparations. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:42, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

I'd sysop you, but I'm not a bureaucrat. Beyond that, I can't think of anything. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:44, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I can, uh, dedicate my next essay to you. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:44, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
You write essays? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:45, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Indeed. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:54, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh yeah. I didn't know about half of those. What the hell happened while you were writing Atheist Logic? Hurricane? Emergence of Shub-Niggurath? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:58, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
I had it! It was brilliant—a stroke of genius! Then I lost it. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:00, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
That's what happened. I hope to someday continue it. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:00, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
Perhaps L could help you.
Oh no, wait, he can't, because he's dead. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 00:03, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
Who is this mysterious 'L' character, why is he deceased, and why do you have a shrine to him? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 07:06, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
♥ L is like God, but cuter. He's dead because some irritating Nietzsche wannabe killed him. And... er.. the shrine is just a social thing... ♥ <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:09, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Anime reference, AK. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:28, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
I'm sensing a certain reluctance on your part to acknowledge the gloriousness of L. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 22:45, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

PS :)

Did you know that Stephen Colbert used the word "afikomen" last night??? (He said "ask your Jewish friends", but I already knew what he meant! - Smart via RW?) ħumanUser talk:Human 02:03, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

Did you get shut down for the night, just as I do by Aschlafly (the ultimate parthian shot!)? Anyway, please, feel free to present your ideas to the mob in the morrow. Use the intercom, if you think it will reach people. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:18, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
Yah, it's freaky how these things turn out, isn't it?  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:30, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
Yes, unfortunately, I do get shut down at night.  : ( Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:30, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
Is that why you haven't joined my epic debate yet? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 22:46, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
You mean the actual Epic Debate, or a new one I haven't heard of yet? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:49, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
The one on Eira's talk page. It is nearly as long as that one, I think, and shows no signs of slowing down. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 22:51, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
Yah, that one is epic. Epic phail ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 23:53, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
Meanie. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 23:54, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

That's not a legitimate minestrone

Seriously. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 00:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

If you're referring to my supper, I make soup whenever I feel like it, minestrone or no minestrone. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:14, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Twelve? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
"I make soup whenever I feel like it, minestrone or no minestrone" -- But no minestrone in particular. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 00:18, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Good Lord. I completely missed that tyco. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:25, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Tyco made the best slop cars. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:43, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Not real typos, RA. But stilt hilarious. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Eh, what coracles? Sounds like an baby-person thing. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:12, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Prombasbibly more of a clacker thing. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:29, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Are you trying to traduce me to the bright side? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:30, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
You have now reached the point where I genuinely can't understand you. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:37, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Pleade allow me to attroduce meself, I am a man of salt and pepper. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:45, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
I see you've met my partner—that mam of thyme and season, Mr. Anthropomorph!  ereh seog egap klat ym ot knil suoiralihnamuħ   01:49, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Was it really worth digging out that sock to say that, RA? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:53, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Who was that masked man, anyway? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:56, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
It was L. Undoubtedly. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:58, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Incidentally, do you remember that picture you edited to make your blasphemy template? I've seen the original, and your version is awful. Why did you use Paint, for God's sake?? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 01:58, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Because it was all I had at the time. And how is it "awful"? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:00, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
It looks like you smeared it with jam. No offence meant -- I would do worse if I had to use such tools -- but I think you should replace it. PSP! Colorise! The future beckons! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 02:01, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Maybe it was "awefull"? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:03, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
What kind of jam? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:08, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Red. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 02:10, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Strop Aubrey Fields for Eva. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
It only contains coloring? I was hoping for fruit. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:13, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
Good night, then. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>Hysterical and useless 02:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
I guess you missed my comment then. JAM! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:30, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

So,

Like my new sig? Pinto's5150 Talk 23:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Eek, a mowse? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:59, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Pinto doesn't even have a mowse. And he can't have one because red is reserved for Radioactive Man :P New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:09, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh, dear... You weren't hoping for me to say something nice, were you? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:01, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
Oddly enough, that looks less like a redlink to me. I must have malfunctioning eyes. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:07, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Maybe you're color blind? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 11:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Nope. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:11, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Maybe you are! New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:12, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Are you pretending to be, then? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 11:19, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Whatever makes you say that? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:30, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Ooh, pretty! Moer color, please! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 11:43, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
No! Do you realise how long it took me to construct that??
Anyway, on a more important matter, do you liek my mowse? You should also have a mowse. A red one. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:49, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Er, no thanks. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 11:57, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
You're not allowed to say no. Them's the rules.
And I'm sorry to hear about your penis :( Do you want to talk about it? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 12:15, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Yes. You see, my penis isn't large enough. I just can't be happy with it. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:23, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
There are (supposedly) email people you can talk to about that. Are we talking about girth or length here?
Actually, please do not answer that. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 12:34, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
You didn't check the link, did you? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:37, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Did! And the metaphor is apparent in your signature as well, but it isn't as amusing as a literal interpretation... New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 12:46, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
You must enjoy being difficult, then. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:47, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) ...ebyaM

Radman's Remix

Whatever makes you say that? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 11:30, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh my God. That's horrible. And RA's new signature is horrible, too. Obviously, you're both colourblind and devoid of any sense of aesthetics. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 20:13, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
I don't see what the problem is. I only seek to tell the truth with my signature  ; ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:26, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

!

Of course I will, you silly fruitcake! I would've done you at the same time as AK (that was a long time ago...), but I was worried about seeming too unilateral -- especially since Human declined when I asked him back in May.
Anyway, welcome to the inner sanctum! We have carrot cake! New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 06:11, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Now pledge your allegiance to L. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 06:18, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Who is L and why does he deserve our allegiance? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 06:38, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I already explained that, actually :P
Or, you can go here if you want helpful information for some reason. Please ignore the pictures from the manga version, as they are painfully uncute. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 06:57, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Thank you for the helpful information, although I must admit I find it difficult to consider this relevant to my interests. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 07:15, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Well you did ask.
In other news, I made you a :P Please spend it wisely. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 07:25, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Thank you, I will. In yet other news, I believe it is your move in the Big Epixxorz Song Contest. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 07:29, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Thank you, Chaos! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:33, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I hear no pledging. *folds arms* New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 12:56, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
All I will pledge is that you were not in any way my rebound friend after Human rejected me.  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:02, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, Human's mean. I heard him call you a "hockey mask fraud" once, even though I begged him not to.
Anyway, Human only rejected you yesterday. We've known each other for ages. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Indeed. Your premise is historically unsound. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Thank you, AK! New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Don't mention it, small child! *flies into the sunset* --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
--AKjeldsenCum dissensie 13:14, 12 September 2008 (EDT).
Come on! I had your mannerisms down perfectly (until I lapsed into some kind of superhero dream). That surely warrants some form of praise? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 13:18, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Hm. I don't know if I'd use the word "unsound". I'd probably use "flawed" instead. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 13:51, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
"Your premise is historically flawed" has an unsatisfying metre. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine)
Unsatisfying? That's a perfectly good iambic pentameter right there: "Your premise is historically flawed". --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:22, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Stop waving your silly iambs in my face. To end the sentence with an anapaest is by far the wiser choice. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 14:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I suppose that depends on the effect you wish to achieve. While I'll admit there is a certain appeal in breaking up the pentameter as a humorous comment on the flawed, or unsound, historical premise itself, I'd really prefer contrasting it to the unmodified, "perfect" pentameter. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:44, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
You appear to be assuming that perfecion is a technical quality. Does this apply to visual art as well? Can I draw a square and call it "the best picture"? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 14:51, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
No, I didn't mean that the pentameter is perfect in the sense of "best", but rather that an unmodified pentameter is a perfect pentameter, considered as a pentameter. Just like a picture of an absolutely regular square would also be one of a "perfect" square. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 14:57, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
But I only said I prefered my version because it sounded better -- if you defend your version based only on the idea that it's more "perfect", you clearly are claiming that it must sound better if it is technically superior. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 15:05, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
No, you advanced your version on the grounds that it was more "satifying" and "the wiser choice". Surely, these too are technical evaluations. Further, I am not using the word "perfect" in any sense of "best", but rather "corresponding to an ideal standard" (1 c) --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:25, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I may have phrased it in the manner of a technical evaluation, but you and I both know that what I really meant was "I like it better". This is often always the case with such phrasing -- indeed, our own songwar is a lengthy exploration of this concept. And I recognise that you meant perfect in a technical sense, what I'm saying is that your statements clearly show that you think that something technically perfect must be superior to something technically imperfect. Despite your shameless literal denial! New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 15:37, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
That is so not fair, Chaos. You're both smarter and quicker with a witty refutation than I am. I expected that from AKjeldsen, but from you? I feel inadequate now... Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:44, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
What, specifically are--
Hold on, I forgot something.
*preens*
There we go. What, specifically, are you referring to, O Foodstuff of Unstable Atomic Constitution? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 15:50, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Now, what sort of meter is that supposed to be in? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:55, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
It's free verse. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 16:59, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh. Well, that's okay, I guess. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:02, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Seriously, RA; what were you talking about? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 04:22, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Yes; if not outright inquiring, then at least slightly curious minds want to know. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:55, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Floor buffer

I'll give it a go. ;) --Robledo 16:25, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Good, good... Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:45, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Vandal? Me?

You're wrong.Bdbdbd 19:57, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

I apologize, Bd. You're name just screamed "Vandal!" at first blush. I hope you'll forgive me for being so quick to accuse. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:04, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Hey

Inquiring minds, etc etc. Do you not read your talk page? Tsk tsk tsk. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 05:19, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

I was referring to this comment of yours. I would need much more than seven minutes to come up with anything that snappy. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:26, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Aw. Fang queue. I did like the triangle part ^_^ New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 05:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Funnily enough, it usually takes me ages to write my comments, even the small ones. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 05:36, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Chaos might be some sort of arts major. Such phrases come naturally to them. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:35, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Ur just jealous :P New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 05:36, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Somewhat. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:41, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Bah. You get to be admired for your articulacy all the time. Let someone else have a go. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 05:46, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
That's fair. You also have the advantage in that you copyedit your stuff. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 06:23, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Are you claiming you don't copyedit your comments? That everything you type comes into existence all perfectly spelled and flawlessly arranged like some kind of sentient crystalline growth? I call bluff! New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 06:29, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
No, quite the contrary. I don't copyedit my comments, which is why they come into existence with, on average, 1.326 errors in spelling, grammar or use of vocabulary. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 06:35, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
I really hate it when my comments come into existence with use of vocabulary :P
Anyway, I think you exaggerate. I bet you at least look your comments over before you post. It would be hard not to. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 06:39, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Sometimes. Unless I'm too lazy. Or forget. Or just don't give a damn because I'm a linguistic rebel. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 06:50, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Best copyedit ever. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 08:54, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
I did that on purpose to illustrate my point. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 09:11, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Hmmph. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 09:42, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Behold! A section that contains no text!

People

Personally, I don't think people already catted in subcats of people also need to be in people. But that's just me. ThunderkatzHo! 19:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT) P.S. I feel like I've had this conversation before with someone else. Anyone remember? ThunderkatzHo! 19:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Personally, I disagree. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:02, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
We've had it at talk category people. RA is the only one who agrees with himself. We should have category:articles, too. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:05, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
I don't see why not. I'll be the first to own up to the implications of my logic. I won't even get in your way (unlike you with me). Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:08, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Auld Nick's not dead!

Failed to parse (syntax error): &#914;&cup;&#182;1&isin;R I'm not dead I've just been busy with something else. Auld Nick 12:05, 15 September 2008 (EDT)