Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tweety"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Tweety (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Jpatt Is Mean)
m (Reverted edits by 67.159.36.19 (Talk) to last version by Nx)
Line 42: Line 42:
 
::::::If you use his real name it's not his online persona only. And your timing was very, ''very'' bad. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 00:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
::::::If you use his real name it's not his online persona only. And your timing was very, ''very'' bad. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 00:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
It's more like you being an immature little git. Which is pretty much what I've come to expect. Let the grown-ups be for a while. [[User:P-Foster|P-Foster]] ([[User talk:P-Foster|talk]]) 00:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
It's more like you being an immature little git. Which is pretty much what I've come to expect. Let the grown-ups be for a while. [[User:P-Foster|P-Foster]] ([[User talk:P-Foster|talk]]) 00:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
:See this is how they treat you when you try to help. Me I'm just a regular girl a cheerleader but just a regular girl but they hate me. Join our cause and block Nx Trent Goonie P-foster and them all!
 

Revision as of 00:43, 18 April 2010

Archive 1

Talk page deletion

Where the hell do you think you're going? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 15:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove talk page comments without archiving them and do not delete talk pages. -- Nx / talk 15:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Archive on his behalf, then? --Kels (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm not going anywhere, I was just testing out deleting stuff Tweety (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
You've got the hang of undeleting too, I see. Good job. --Kels (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

buttsecks?

why do I like the sound of that word... it's ... reminiscent. teh rational ghey (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah..... *sigh* Tweetylet's have buttsecks 15:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
whats wrong? teh rational ghey (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Haha I'm fine, just sighing whilst reminiscing about buttsecks Tweetylet's have buttsecks 15:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
HAHAH That made my day --teh rational ghey (talk) 15:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Added a new topic to the gay club teh rational ghey (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Accent :) teh rational ghey (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Talking about fucking real people by name

Do it again and you're done here. P-Foster (talk) 16:04,15 April 2010 (UTC)

Why, what's wrong with discussing sexual fantasies? Or is this fear of his legal threats again? Tweetylet's have buttsecks 16:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
this is a question of displaying a modicum of respect for another human being. Grow up. P-Foster (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah sure, because everyone here respects CP, and TK is an amazing individual, who not only treats others with respect and courtesy, but has earned it through diligent hard work himself Tweetylet's have buttsecks 16:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
It was hypothetical, so I don't think it posed any real problem. That's not to say it wouldn't cause personal ones... — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 16:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
You never know, it might make TK curious. Then hopefully if he turned gay, he'd also go liberal. And chill out Tweetylet's have buttsecks 16:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Look, making personal attacks on CPians won't get you any respect. Try posting intelligently or humorously. Educated cubic Hoover! 16:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Plus, the thought of TK with a buttfull of mansawce is too much without a large amount or alcohol. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 13:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Too much.. ever. teh rational ghey (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Tweety (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Jpatt Is Mean

Not how we roll. Thanks. P-Foster (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

More to the point, it's pointless once the person has already been hit with the vandal brake, because it does that automatically anyways. So, while I appreciate your efforts, it's kinda not needed. Cheers, though. Conservative Punk (talk) 22:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I did it because I didn't realise the brake did that, so thanks. And stop being so fucking quick to try and find any excuse to reprimand me, just the other day you basically threatened to permaban me for talking about buttsecks Tweetylet's have buttsecks 22:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I will when you learn to behave...It wasn't about "buttsecks"; it was about you choosing to sexually harass a REAL PERSON by their REAL NAME--a person who is decidedly a hot-button issue around here-- via this online community. Not cool. P-Foster (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Sexually harrass? Get fucking real. It was a joke about gay sex because he belongs to a site promoting bigotry. Big fucking deal, get over it Tweetylet's have buttsecks 00:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Regardless of what sort of discourses happen on CP about homosexuality, making sexually-charged comments about a person by name counts as sexual harassment. If you did it to him on the street, on the phone, via e-mail or otherwise, he would have every right to call you out for sexual harassment--or to punch you in the nose if he's had a couple of drinks. It was a classless and immature move, and nowhere near this community's standards. P-Foster (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Sexually charged? Starting a joke discussion about a joke scenario is not sexually charged by any stretch of the imagination. And maybe you'll stop rimming him and realise he's a manipulative bully. Stop bullshitting and looking for any excuse to get in a dig at me. Accusing me of sexual harrassment when i made a joke about someone, their online persona to be precise, is too far. Suck my fucking dick. Or is that harrassment? Twat. Tweetylet's have buttsecks 00:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
If you use his real name it's not his online persona only. And your timing was very, very bad. -- Nx / talk 00:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

It's more like you being an immature little git. Which is pretty much what I've come to expect. Let the grown-ups be for a while. P-Foster (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)