User talk:Rodlen

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Rodlen!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hiya. rational ghey (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Good to see a nice welcome. Rodlen (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Quieted down?[edit]

Sounds very odd to me. What's wrong with 'quieten'? Ro Thorpe (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Huh. I find "quietened down" sounds odder, but then again, I'm an odd person. The "of course" just felt like it didn't belong, though. Rodlen (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Must be a British/American thing. Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Canadian English being a weird conglomeration of British and American English, probably. Rodlen (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
You & User:Human are Canadians? Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't know about Human, but I am. Rodlen (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm 90% sure that Human is from the northeastern US. Tetronian you're clueless 21:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that, but I was infected with Britishness when young. There's probably a better word than either quieted or quietened though. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

In light of your good contribs here and help against vandals, you have been made a sysop. Here's your mop and bucket. The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 23:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. Thanks. Rodlen (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

CP:The closet[edit]

Even if they block you, it's best not to 'come out' on here right away, as they are more likely to revert your work if they know you are a member of RW. DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 08:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Aye. I will try to remember that next time I get caught. Rodlen (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Godspeed!!![edit]

"Anonymous User" (I see you don't use the proper naming convention), I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you seem to believe that the Romans had the concept of "truth", so it's obvious to me you're trying to hurt this project. You are in complete denial that that capital punishment prevents breast cancer. Do yourself a favor and admit that many American Muslims drink beer. If you can't explain in your own words why you think that school was founded by atheists and is so prominent today, then give up and try debating a topic you can put in your own words. If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--Andy Schlafly 04:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 06:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

"Anonymous User" (I see you don't use the proper naming convention), I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you seem to believe that the Romans had the concept of "truth", so it's obvious to me you're trying to hurt this project. You are in complete denial that that capital punishment prevents breast cancer. Do yourself a favor and admit that many American Muslims drink beer. If you can't explain in your own words why you think that school was founded by atheists and is so prominent today, then give up and try debating a topic you can put in your own words. If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--Andy Schlafly 04:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Rodlen (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Gentlemen! I will program your precious oganesson, enabling me to destroy Richard Dawkins on the internet. You should all be modelling over Operation apple, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

HOW ARE YOU GENTLEMEN!!

User: Conservative learns somewhat libertarian on the political compass, whereas there are many authoritarian admins at RationalWiki. RationalWiki is doing a poor job at combatting authoritarianism! your lack of faith are utterly lackluster. When it comes to Darwin and suicide, you censor that it is common for skeptics to claim that Paul or Peter did not write such and such New Testament book but they were written by others who assumed their name. In fact, by my birthday, it is likely the pearl-clutching pansies at RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Charging Cheetahs is gathering steam!!! I am pleased to announce that I just sent out 24 emails. Sincerely,

A user of the Conservative account Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 06:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)