File talk:Pie-RationalWiki-2011-8.png

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I hate to bring this up, but Thunderkatz, Reckless Noise Symphony and I are still Ninjas. Тytalk 19:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Um Ty, Larron does these per script and if 4 blocked out of 396 make less than 1%, 3 out of 396 also makes less than 1% and everything under 1% percent get's a 0% in the chart. At least that's how I put it together... --ʤɱ atheist 19:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Look at the chart. I make 5% by my lonesome. Katz and RNS are also quite active. Тytalk 19:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
1% of users, not edits - but I guess that doesn't matter anyway now. --ʤɱ federalist 19:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
No, the reason for this is another one: I ranked the various groups as you can see in the legend of File:Table-RationalWiki-2011-8.png: you are only counted in one group, the uppermost one. I underestimated the importance of the ninjas :-) - perhaps I'll change the ranking and rectify my error: I wouldn't like to offend those stealthy warriors, would I? larronsicut fur in nocte 19:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
I have no clue how this works but will still be a pain in the ass about it: Wouldn't it be easier with (1) clear numbers and (2) to work with more than one value for an editor, so that you get more than 100%? --ʤɱ constructivist 19:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
@LArron I slip unseen like script. Тytalk 20:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

@umh: generally there is a natural order on the groups, from having most rights to having no rights at all. As I use colors to represent the Gruppenzugehörigkeit :-), I have to stick to one group - unless I want to start with shading (or tartans) And no, you are no pain the ass!

@ninjas: I hope the current solution is sufficient

larronsicut fur in nocte 20:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, it's fine, I was just feeling pedantic. Тytalk 23:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)