There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nx"
m (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 72h) to User talk:Nx/Archive13.) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? [[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>omg ponies!!!</font>]]</sup> 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? [[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>omg ponies!!!</font>]]</sup> 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. {{User:Human/sig|}} 01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | :Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. {{User:Human/sig|}} 01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Just a question about a log == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Human made a nice [[:File_talk:RW_cratship_tree.png|pic]]. I tried to take a closer look at the entries, a stumbled upon some inconsistencies in the user-rights log. For instance, here's an excerpt of [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANx&year=&month=-1|your log]: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | # 13:18, 17 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to Irrational numbers (this is more appropriate) | ||
+ | # 02:50, 14 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to (none) | ||
+ | # 01:33, 11 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats, Irrational numbers and Sysops to (none) | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, you decratted yourself three times in a row, without being cratted again in the mean time. How is this possible? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just intrigued, | ||
+ | Yours {{User:LArron/sig}} 18:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :There are more things with root than are dreamt of in your philosophy. tmtoulouse 19:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :He edited the database, or used a maintenance script. {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 19:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:27, 18 June 2010
Can you talk some sense to Foster?
I think you raised the issue of vandal binning IPs previously, and how it only affects innocents and leaves me entirely unscathed. Even a moments reflection and people would understand this. Unfortunately, he is so idiotic now that he won't even read such a kind of complaint. I would appreciate it. 74.63.112.137 (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I did. Nice concern trolling. -- Nx / talk 23:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think its important, regardless of concern trolling or not. Obviously innocent people are affected and the guilty parties (ME) are not. Under any system of comprehension, that is illogical. I really hope RW doesn't adopt the attitude 'well since MC is suggesting it we must do the opposite'. That surely is a sign that I've won! 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't give a shit. -- Nx / talk 23:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- You don't care that millions of people may potentially be prohibited from activity in this site? How big of you. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't give a shit. -- Nx / talk 23:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think its important, regardless of concern trolling or not. Obviously innocent people are affected and the guilty parties (ME) are not. Under any system of comprehension, that is illogical. I really hope RW doesn't adopt the attitude 'well since MC is suggesting it we must do the opposite'. That surely is a sign that I've won! 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Its clearly much more simple not to bin the IPs in the first place. Just ban instead. Infinitely more logical. That is all. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said, I don't care. I'm not even a sysop. -- Nx / talk 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're very petty, for a fascist. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said, I don't care. I'm not even a sysop. -- Nx / talk 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Irrational numbers and stuff
Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. ħuman
01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Just a question about a log
Human made a nice pic. I tried to take a closer look at the entries, a stumbled upon some inconsistencies in the user-rights log. For instance, here's an excerpt of log:
- 13:18, 17 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to Irrational numbers (this is more appropriate)
- 02:50, 14 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to (none)
- 01:33, 11 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats, Irrational numbers and Sysops to (none)
So, you decratted yourself three times in a row, without being cratted again in the mean time. How is this possible?
Just intrigued, Yours larronsicut fur in nocte 18:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)