Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nx"
m (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 72h) to User talk:Nx/Archive13.) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? [[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>omg ponies!!!</font>]]</sup> 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? [[User:Concernedresident|<font color="black">'''ConcernedResident'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Concernedresident|<font color=blue>omg ponies!!!</font>]]</sup> 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. {{User:Human/sig|}} 01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | :Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. {{User:Human/sig|}} 01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Just a question about a log == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Human made a nice [[:File_talk:RW_cratship_tree.png|pic]]. I tried to take a closer look at the entries, a stumbled upon some inconsistencies in the user-rights log. For instance, here's an excerpt of [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANx&year=&month=-1|your log]: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | # 13:18, 17 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to Irrational numbers (this is more appropriate) | ||
+ | # 02:50, 14 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to (none) | ||
+ | # 01:33, 11 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats, Irrational numbers and Sysops to (none) | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, you decratted yourself three times in a row, without being cratted again in the mean time. How is this possible? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just intrigued, | ||
+ | Yours {{User:LArron/sig}} 18:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :There are more things with root than are dreamt of in your philosophy. tmtoulouse 19:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :He edited the database, or used a maintenance script. {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 19:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:27, 18 June 2010
Can you talk some sense to Foster?
I think you raised the issue of vandal binning IPs previously, and how it only affects innocents and leaves me entirely unscathed. Even a moments reflection and people would understand this. Unfortunately, he is so idiotic now that he won't even read such a kind of complaint. I would appreciate it. 74.63.112.137 (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I did. Nice concern trolling. -- Nx / talk 23:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think its important, regardless of concern trolling or not. Obviously innocent people are affected and the guilty parties (ME) are not. Under any system of comprehension, that is illogical. I really hope RW doesn't adopt the attitude 'well since MC is suggesting it we must do the opposite'. That surely is a sign that I've won! 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't give a shit. -- Nx / talk 23:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- You don't care that millions of people may potentially be prohibited from activity in this site? How big of you. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't give a shit. -- Nx / talk 23:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think its important, regardless of concern trolling or not. Obviously innocent people are affected and the guilty parties (ME) are not. Under any system of comprehension, that is illogical. I really hope RW doesn't adopt the attitude 'well since MC is suggesting it we must do the opposite'. That surely is a sign that I've won! 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Its clearly much more simple not to bin the IPs in the first place. Just ban instead. Infinitely more logical. That is all. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said, I don't care. I'm not even a sysop. -- Nx / talk 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're very petty, for a fascist. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said, I don't care. I'm not even a sysop. -- Nx / talk 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Irrational numbers and stuff
Is that how Nx should stay or was that a case of inverse admin abuse? i.e. a round a roundabout way of saying double you tea eff? ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 01:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Nx refers to RW in the second person, which really confuses me at times. ħuman 01:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Just a question about a log
Human made a nice pic. I tried to take a closer look at the entries, a stumbled upon some inconsistencies in the user-rights log. For instance, here's an excerpt of log:
- 13:18, 17 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to Irrational numbers (this is more appropriate)
- 02:50, 14 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats and Sysops to (none)
- 01:33, 11 December 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Nx from Bureaucrats, Irrational numbers and Sysops to (none)
So, you decratted yourself three times in a row, without being cratted again in the mean time. How is this possible?
Just intrigued, Yours larronsicut fur in nocte 18:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)