RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Argument from marginal cases

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Argument from marginal cases | Result: Completely marginalized[edit]

Argument from marginal cases (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. I don't really think that we should have an article that says severely disabled people are comparable to animals. Even beyond that, this article is messy, confusing, and poorly sourced, and numerous others have pointed out these problems on the talk page. The article is irredeemable in its current state and if another article were to be made on the topic it would be best to start from scratch. Plutocow (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Cursory look at it supports Pluto's case. Besides the dig at disabled people, I saw three references. IIRC someone deleted some more meandering portions a little bit ago but it's best to kill it with fire and start anew. Vee (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. Agree with the points above, hasn’t been properly worked on since 2019, poorly sourced and seems like a confusing mess.-WMS (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. This is a prominent anti-speciesist argument, but the presentation in this article is inadequately precise. Enough work would need to be done that starting from scratch would likely be comparable. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 01:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]