RationalWiki talk:Webshites

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Contents

[edit] Fun thing to do

Use waybackmachine to look back at when Conspiracy sites first started:

Churns out the same shit over and over

For example, quote mines:

"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order."

David Rockefeller, long accused of being a shill for the NWO, in his memior finally tired of the facade and admitted what he had been accused of for many decades, when he said this about his familys involvement in the NWO:

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

And in 2008, with the election of President Barack Hussein Obama, Henry Kissinger said that Obama would bring about the long desired New World Order:

"I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a 'New World Order' can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis..."


No longer is the New World Order the realm of "conspiracy theorists" frantically writing stories of government takeovers from a basement somewhere. No, the NWO is now shouted loudly from the rooftops by every leading government and political figure in newscasts 24 hours a day.

And then Henry Makow's site

And who could forget about Alex Jones, and everythign he's touched?

[edit] This might be a fine add to this lovely little abomination-topia of a section.

https://biblicalgenderroles.com/ This place is acrap-hole, it glorifies a whole bunch of pretty crappy things to do, and of course uses the bible as an excuse to do it.

[edit] Are there any entries on this page that you think should be added to a different section?

For instance, which entries in "Bible-thumping" and "Lack-of-religious-text-thumping (a.k.a. "Rationals", "Skeptics")" seem to fit more at home with entries featured in sections like, "Conservative, right-wing, "cultural libertarians", "classical liberals", and reactionary"?— Unsigned, by: Historybuff / talk / contribs

I don't know (writing this so it archives properly). Christopher (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
This page still suffers a little from having been merged with another page called "List of Internet Kooks" a while back. It's very difficult to categorize many of the webshites here as they have overlapping characteristics. For example, a right wing bible-thumper who's also a paranoid conspiracy theorist could be classified under bible-thumpers or conpiracists. I tried my best to clean up the categories but there could be some more work done. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 18:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

[edit] A lot of these entries are shit

Poorly written and not sourced. Listicles like this are either meant to be intra-wiki link farms or brief summaries that link you out to better explanations; the article fails both. Would it make sense to require that statement are cited properly -- since this whole article is about living people? FuzzyCatPotato of the Bad Yogurts (talk/stalk) 12:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

It's overdue for a purge, especially the large amount of links to youtoob kooks with nothing but a link supplied. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Okay, then...

Why is ShoeOnHead in "Sometimes shite, sometimes not"? TheMyon (talk) 18:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Two MGTOW webshites that might be worth adding

NO, MA'AM and The Masculine Principle. They seem to be written by the same author, and the latter links a lot to the former. ThineAntidote (talk) 22:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools