Search results
Only searching in pages whose title starts with "RationalWiki:Chicken coop" (Search all pages)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Ryulong" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
- RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive37 (section Should we desysop Ryulong? (Resolution: Ryulong renounced sysopship))you feel that Ryulong is such a bad dude, then ban Ryulong for several months. Or vandal bin him. Or perma-ban him like Tisane. If Ryulong is so wrong,240 KB (33,420 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive41 (section Ryulong)options for dealing with Ryu seem to be: Ban Ryulong Topic ban Ryulong Create a specific set of rules for Ryulong including "No undo-ing without any discussion"223 KB (29,595 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive35 (section Ryulong)discussion on the Chicken Coop. As such, I reopped Exiled and reopped Ryulong. Ryulong has brought this up on numerous pages and mentioned a previous Chicken69 KB (9,859 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- targeting Ryulong like this before, in the past. The thing that infuriates me here, was that it was my edit he was reverting, but his focus was on Ryulong. Like42 KB (6,062 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- garbage that "Ryulong is just as bad as the windmills he's tilting against" doesn't help for shit. Take your concern trolling elsewhere.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:22192 KB (27,274 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive39 (section Block Ryulong for causing and bringing endless drama to the wiki)like a Bad Idea®.—Ryulong (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC) Given that nearly every coop in the last 12 months has involved Ryulong in one form another98 KB (13,761 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive36 (section Ryulong)or fuzzy cat potato?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC) We don't block people for being cocks. Be thankful for that Ryulong; extend other people181 KB (26,614 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- February 2015 (UTC) Tielec01 I never blocked him.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Apologies Ryulong you are correct it was DG who blocked him. It41 KB (5,812 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- says "buddyloid" so Ryulong must have it that way, even though the rest of the english-speaking world disagrees. My favorite Ryulong mistranslation is the233 KB (34,016 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- left page. You helped to drive off Carpetsmoker and were a defender of Ryulong. So tell me again how you have had no problems.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 15:5020 KB (2,543 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- to haphazardly enact — in order to intimidate and harass — like Mona or Ryulong would. The fact that you combined the desysopping with vandal binning the148 KB (18,390 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- having a specific viewpoint. Basically, the above is about the legality of Ryulong-type behaviour over extended periods of time, impeding the work of numerous180 KB (22,200 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- being banned. Community. "Sanction." Is. A. Joke. Someone needs to contact Ryulong and tell him to come on back, just with a different name. That I spent even86 KB (13,068 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- be hypocritical of me to not extend her the same good faith I extended Ryulong in very similar circumstances. She is stressed out and exhausted for very121 KB (18,263 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018
- 2016 (UTC) Your inexplicable enabling of the Champion Internet Fucktard, Ryulong, has robbed you of all credibility here, DG. Now you seek to repeat the146 KB (19,614 words) - 19:27, 8 December 2018