2015 Fundraiser

Help us beat last year's record of $7100!

Awesome! We are half way to our goal!
Goal: $7,200 Donations so far: $7097.32
Free speech isn't free. Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate today!

Talk:Negative proof

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Thats odd. If your talking about me then i must point out that the "evendence" was very weak. It smelled like trash. 15:44, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

"Smells like trash" is not much of a rebuttal. But as you pointed out, since you are just trolling this isn't a "debate" and so the fact that you have failed to substantiate your points beyond mud flinging is meainingless. tmtoulouse persecute 15:46, 2 November 2007 (EDT)

[edit] Google

this page is showing up in Google's predictive text thingy. Has somebody linked to it or sumpfink? If so, perhaps it should be added to Category:Entry points. Totnesmartin (talk) 22:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

"One might also note that the saying itself is a negative." Hahaha! (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Weak

"This point, however, is completely lost on most creationists (such as intelligent design advocates) who shout from the rooftops that there are no transitional fossils long after they've been repeatedly shown them."

This is so POV. Atheists are atrocious when it comes to resorting to logical fallacies.

Personal tools