Board elections.

The RationalMedia Foundation board elections are a'happenin'.

  • Nominations will commence on 26 June 2016 and run through 10 July 2016.
  • The voting dates are TBA.

To register to vote: RationalWiki:RationalMedia Foundation/Voter registration

Useful links:

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 18:49, 26 June 2016

Talk:Poe's Law

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon internet.svg

This Internet related article has been awarded GOLD status for quality. Please keep this in mind when editing the article.

This article is of HIGH importance to the wiki.

See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Information icon.svg Cover Story
This article is, among others, randomly included on the Main Page.
Please keep this in mind and be sure that your edits are of the quality that this implies.
Its front-page abstract can be found here and its editnotice here.

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>


This article was identified as a possible duplicate of List of Poe's Law examples, but it was decided to keep the articles separate.


[edit] Alternative rendering

'There is no cure for deliberate/malign stupidity.' (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Deliberate stupidity has an easy cure: stop being deliberately stupid. Anyway, what's that got to do with parody, or Poe's Law? WēāŝēīōīďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Meta-Poe

Arguably, it's easy enough to spot parody. The real difficulty is spotting the difference between people falling for the joke and people getting in on the joke when it comes to discussing it. Scarlet A.pngpathetic 15:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] New Conservapedia

If this is a joke, would it be worth adding here? Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 18:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

No. WēāŝēīōīďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 06:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Postmodernism and Poe

Can a Poe's Law version of [1] be created? (The summaries do seem to describe 'real books' in that field) (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

[edit] "Poe's Inversion"? (The "Just kidding"-defence)

I was wondering after my pointed comments on environmental classism regarding the "We were just joking"-explanation for the contents of the Summers memo[wp] whether it's an inversion of Poe's Law when people called out on something use the "Just kidding"-escape hatch? Or is it some other fallacy/trope that covers such behaviour? ScepticWombat (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

[edit] Variant?

There is a statement that anyone who 'deliberately and unnecessarily brings Hitler/Stalin/other snarl term person' into a discussion has automatically lost the argument ('the newt' and 'the bike' being recent examples). Is this a variant of Poe's Law or does it have another name? (talk) 13:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You are probably looking for Godwin's Law. Category:Eponymous laws might also be of use.--JorisEnter (talk) 13:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I normally leave Poe/Godwin infractors well alone - the two groups probably overlap to some extent. (talk) 13:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal tools