Talk:Pyrrhonism
<pyrrhonism joke>None of this article is true.</pyrrhonism joke> Totnesmartin 19:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- I lolled. Tetronian you're clueless 19:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- No you didn't! Totnesmartin 19:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe I did, maybe I didn't. The worst part is, you can never know! Tetronian you're clueless 19:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- No you didn't! Totnesmartin 19:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Define Pyrrhonic victory. — Unsigned, by: 212.85.6.26 / talk / contribs 17:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
[edit] My two cents on Pyrrhonism
This philosophy speaks right to my soul. I hate judgmental assholes who are oh so sure of everything and hold opinions of everything and anything. "Guilty until proven innocent! I shall make blanket statements all day about Chinese-Japanese nationalistic relationships and the completely valid opinions I hold of why and how they came about! After all, I am entitled to my opinion, and I hold that I am as well-informed as the next guy, so all my judgments are fine!" No, just no. Where do you get all this confidence, how can you justify making so many blanket statements? Think before you judge, exercise caution before you jump to conclusions. The world would be better if people learned from Pyrrhonism. Just my two cents. Nullahnung (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- Pyrrhonism took it quite beyond "don't jump to conclussions".--ZooGuard (talk) 08:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I suppose. There is a profound skepticism behind everything, which is on quite another level than the example I ranted on. But it feeds into my tendencies to understand a level of uncertainty behind everything I perceive. Of course, I don't just descend into Solipsist tendencies or anything, I just think it is interesting and sound to perceive things as apparent realities instead of "hard realities" and this attitude would then somehow teach me caution... or something. Yeah, I realize my reasoning is really flimsy, but I do feel that way deep down inside. Nullahnung (talk) 08:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Pyrrhonism or paranoid skepticism?
After this edit by what appears to be an apologist for Pyrrhonism, the "sample 5 minutes" are senseless. Either the article should be reverted to its previous state, or if everyone agrees with the apparent apologist that Pyrrhonism is not the same as the insane hyperskepticism depicted here, the section should be removed. --84.151.141.21 (talk)