Talk:Systems thinking

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Very negative description of System's thinking, very one sided, and not really very clear what "systems thinking is". As a non-philosopher, I had to read this article twice, then go to wiki to understand "systems thinking". The wiki article is much more clear, but more importantly, shows systems thinking is an important way to see the world. I'd like to make some changes, but I'd like to recruit someone who actually knows what this is, to look them over? Pink mowse.pngGodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll. 14:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, there is something very wrong here. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 15:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
It was started by LX, so REDSREDSREDSREDSREDSREDS!!!!!! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Perhaps. I think it's because it's focused entirely on politics I'm not sure it gets the message across well. Sure, some of those applications may well be invalid but that doesn't therefore imply "systems thinking" is wrong. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 16:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I assume that business, religion, and engineering qualify as "politics" for the purposes of that statement? Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 18:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, the section on engineering is a joke. Scarlet A.pngnarchist 19:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools