User talk:Bongolian

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>


[edit] Response

I didn't change anything you edited. All I did was add a warning label to the website. Aurelius (talk)23 February 2016 (EST)

[edit] Mind taking a look this?

I've no idea if the guy is a concern troll or if he has legitimately excellent points. His sources, whatever they contain, use nice URLs (NCBI, if nothing else. But really, I've barely glanced at any of this.

Since you're well versed at this type of thing (and since I'm just about to slide shut the lid of my coffin and get to sleep before the dawn's first rays of sunlight char my ancient face), I figured maybe you could give the BoN's concerns a (re)view. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

This statement should also be assessed. Thanks. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
I have commented there, but the topic is actually outside my areas of expertise. More eyes on this would be helpful. Bongolian (talk) 20:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Taking out the trash

No need to bother unwelcoming troll accounts. Also, for that much spamming (see RC), a 1 hour block is way too little. And don't forget to vandal bin vandals ASAP, even when they haven't earned a particularly long block (assuming their 1 offending edit was vandalism). Thanks for looking out, anyways. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, Percy! I didn't initially realize they were also doing it from multiple accounts. Bongolian (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Not to sound presumptous, but

Remember to always take nobs' words with an extra pinch of salt. You know, just... considering. All the best buddy, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Percy. Once he got into Nixon worship and the various made up "Ages" in the Saloon, it became pretty clear. He did have an interesting perspective on his former residence though. Bongolian (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Nobs certainly is interesting. But as much as he likes to wall-of-text about geopolitics — almost coming across as sensible at times — keep in mind that (as recently as yesterday) he was openly calling for Hillary and Obama, among others, to be "marched out and summarily shot". xD Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
I think that's a bit unfair, I think he was just saying he thought they were corrupt. It was just because of how you asked the question. Even nobs wouldn't go that far, or would he? Christopher (talk) 11:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't think it's unfair in the least to ask the man a direct question:
"Do you think [the people you just listed] should be X?"
Getting a:
"Yes, I do think that X should be done to [the following 3 of the people 5 I just listed]".
And in return, citing that reply as:
"Nobs was openly calling for [those 3 people he specified] to be X".
Though I consider it vital that I actually linked to the original exchange in full.
Feel free to ask the man for a clarification on his views if you're uncertain — it's what I did to get the above cited reply in the first place Th hug.gif
And I do think that nobs thinks that he thinks that, yes. But unless you've read this entire thing, you wouldn't be used to the way he, uh... "reasons". All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk)09:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Yo dawg

I herd you like limericks, so I put a limerick in your limerick so you can limerick while you limerick.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 07:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Krej! Bongolian (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
No prob.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 08:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal tools