User talk:FuzzyCatPotato

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>


[edit] Join the coalition

A grand combination is about to take place- a grand unity between Fat Aardvark and Paravant. Fat Aardvark shall be the military strategist and Paravant shall assume his old role of dictator.

Join us.— Unsigned, by: MLC2 / talk / contribs

[edit] So I know we got off to a bad start...

Why not bury the hatchet eh? Also lets be on first name terms, nice to meet you I'm 4ardvark— Unsigned, by: FuzzyCatTomato / talk / contribs

[edit] I salute your bravery.

Vale — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

[edit] On S0H

This discussion was moved to Talk:Shoe0nHead.

[edit] r/AznIdentity

It's obvious that /r/AznIdentity is now vandalizing our edits. Is there any way to block users coming from there? Or to ban users who try and remove the entry and replace it with totally non-offensive ones? — Unsigned, by: 10101 / talk / contribs

Strange as it is for an IP-addressed user to say, perhaps edit privileges should be limited in some way? Heaven knows /r/Aznidentity is quite the handful, and they've already demonstrated poor behaviour here.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

[edit] looking into issue

this user is requesting user FuzzyCatPotato to look into the issue of the most recent vandal-binning imposed upon this user, which this user considers to be a misplaced one. this user noticed that user FuzzyCatPotato possesses administrative powers over other administrators, thus summoning the user.this user might be on a wrong observation. — Unsigned, by: FAMAS / talk / contribs

[edit] Passive aggression

This discussion was moved to RW:BAR.

[edit] FYI

This discussion was moved to RW:BAR.

[edit] Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.


This is in reference to Laci Green's page.

If the statements are true, they should be mentioned and said that it's true.

If the statements are false, they should be mentioned and said that it's false.

In all the cases, the sentences are to be mentioned.

If the sentences are mentioned, and it's said that they are false, and whatever reasoning Hipocrite has is written down, RW will improve both in terms of quality and quantity.

Sadly, Hipocrite is not interested in that.

As an admin, I would request you to reverse his edits, protect the page, place Hipocrite in vandal bin, remove whatever user rights he has.

Thanks. Rational1 (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I've had some problems with this editor too - he's unilaterally reverting changes and improvements to articles crying "whitewash" even when they've been discussed with other editors and admins and it was agreed they were improvements, he seems to be more interested in crusading against specific "targets" he has beef with than improving the content a la RW's policies.--BrittanyPBone (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
See Rational1 (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

[edit] It's time

To unban AmazingSkeptic. (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

How do I turn this into a gif? nobs 22:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Bernie doesn't share food. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

No idea, but this will help: Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 23:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Views of Pages

On wikipedia there are view counts for pages. Is there going to be something like that here? It would be interesting to see what is getting lots of views, as a public thing. Roo (talk) 15:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Already on my mental list for after we've overhauled the current MediaWiki software! Th hug.gif Now, if only Trent wasn't so busy all the time... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal tools