Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:Chicken coop"
(→Human) |
(→Human) |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
He persistently reverts clearly non-vandalism edits without any explanation whatsoever, especially edits by fairly new editors. This behaviour is toxic to good community structure, and I recommend that he either stop or be stripped of all his administrative powers. (As an aside, ''please'' change this page back to Administrative Abuse. The current name just reinforces its trivialisation.) {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 20:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | He persistently reverts clearly non-vandalism edits without any explanation whatsoever, especially edits by fairly new editors. This behaviour is toxic to good community structure, and I recommend that he either stop or be stripped of all his administrative powers. (As an aside, ''please'' change this page back to Administrative Abuse. The current name just reinforces its trivialisation.) {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 20:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Accusations would be better presented with a shred, or better yet, a cornucopia, of evidence. For instance, are you defending [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Homeopathy&curid=690&diff=666344&oldid=666343 this] edit? {{User:Human/sig|}} 03:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | :Accusations would be better presented with a shred, or better yet, a cornucopia, of evidence. For instance, are you defending [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Homeopathy&curid=690&diff=666344&oldid=666343 this] edit? {{User:Human/sig|}} 03:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::I agree with Phantom Hoover about changing the page's name back, but I think a ''slapped wrist'' is a more adequate sanction for Human than desysopping. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 03:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Thanks, but a slapped wrist for ''what''? No evidence has been presented. I move for summary dismissal on account of complete lack prosecutor's/plaintiff's case. {{User:Human/sig|}} 03:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::You have reverted a number of ''my'' edits without explanation, for starters; several of which other editors later restored, if I recall. Diffs to follow. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 03:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::I'm sure I have. Awaiting diffs with bated breath! Bring it on! {{User:Human/sig|}} 03:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Code_word&diff=next&oldid=664316] — this was objected to on the talk-page, by myself and at least two other editors. You did not appear to respond. | ||
+ | ::::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&diff=prev&oldid=655780] — this one was out of the blue. | ||
+ | ::::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=France&diff=542738&oldid=542735] — later [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=France&diff=543288&oldid=543286 restored] by TheoryOfPractice, or whatever he is calling himself these days. | ||
+ | ::::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Holocaust_denial&diff=prev&oldid=662033] — I changed this one back, and Blue reverted me, but ''with explanation''. | ||
+ | ::::::Some others: [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Southern_strategy&diff=prev&oldid=663933] [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=665153] [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Citizendium&diff=prev&oldid=662579] [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Fellatio&diff=prev&oldid=662087] [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Vladimir_Putin&diff=prev&oldid=662070] [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mohandas_Gandhi&diff=prev&oldid=655789] {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 03:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::From going through your last 500 mainspace edits, here are five instances in which a ''registered user'' (not an IP or an offensively named user) made a good-faith, non-vandalism edit which was reverted by Human without explanation: | ||
+ | :::::::'''''Afterwards restored by another bureaucrat:''''' | ||
+ | :::::::*[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&diff=prev&oldid=666186 Heavy metal music], [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&action=history restored] by {{u|Phantom Hoover}} and then again by {{u|Armondikov}} | ||
+ | :::::::*[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Southern_strategy&diff=prev&oldid=663933 Southern strategy], [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Southern_strategy&action=history restored] by {{u|Nx}} | ||
+ | :::::::*[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Deepity&diff=prev&oldid=658723 Deepity], [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Deepity&action=history restored] by {{u|Armondikov}} | ||
+ | :::::::'''''Not restored, but no explanation given:''''' | ||
+ | :::::::*[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ayn_Rand&diff=prev&oldid=662688 Ayn Rand] | ||
+ | :::::::*[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Fahrenheit_9/11&diff=prev&oldid=662580 Fahrenheit 9/11] | ||
+ | :::::::''I am not defending the quality of these edits'' - whether they were good or not is not the point. {{User:Blue/sig}} 04:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::I also do not want to dispute the merits of the reverted edits in my diffs. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 04:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::And while we're at it, [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Peak_uranium&diff=prev&oldid=659984 this one]. [[Special:Contributions/24.13.203.96|24.13.203.96]] ([[User talk:24.13.203.96|talk]]) 04:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::::Wrong editor, BoN. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 04:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::::Damn, let's not allow evidence in my favor to prejudice the jury! You are pathetic. {{User:Human/sig|}} 04:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | Lol. Compare what I improved and created over the last 24 hours to your incredibly important concerns. {{User:Human/sig|}} 04:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :"whether they were good or not is not the point" really? {{User:Human/sig|}} 04:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::(EC) Stop changing the subject. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 04:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Stop changing the object. {{User:Human/sig|}} 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::(EC) New users don't give a flute about how many edits you've made, Human, all they see is your revert. {{User:Blue/sig}} 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::Human, this is not about your other edits, but about your overuse of rollback. {{User:ListenerX/sig0}} 04:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Rename== | ||
+ | Can we get this page renamed to "Lynch mob"? Because that would be awesome kthxbai. [[Special:Contributions/24.13.203.96|24.13.203.96]] ([[User talk:24.13.203.96|talk]]) 03:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:14, 10 October 2010
This page is for the reporting of abuse and other problems
Human
He persistently reverts clearly non-vandalism edits without any explanation whatsoever, especially edits by fairly new editors. This behaviour is toxic to good community structure, and I recommend that he either stop or be stripped of all his administrative powers. (As an aside, please change this page back to Administrative Abuse. The current name just reinforces its trivialisation.) Harmonic time Hoover! 20:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Accusations would be better presented with a shred, or better yet, a cornucopia, of evidence. For instance, are you defending this edit? ħuman 03:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Phantom Hoover about changing the page's name back, but I think a slapped wrist is a more adequate sanction for Human than desysopping. ListenerXTalkerX 03:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but a slapped wrist for what? No evidence has been presented. I move for summary dismissal on account of complete lack prosecutor's/plaintiff's case. ħuman 03:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- You have reverted a number of my edits without explanation, for starters; several of which other editors later restored, if I recall. Diffs to follow. ListenerXTalkerX 03:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sure I have. Awaiting diffs with bated breath! Bring it on! ħuman 03:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- [1] — this was objected to on the talk-page, by myself and at least two other editors. You did not appear to respond.
- [2] — this one was out of the blue.
- [3] — later restored by TheoryOfPractice, or whatever he is calling himself these days.
- [4] — I changed this one back, and Blue reverted me, but with explanation.
- Some others: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] ListenerXTalkerX 03:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- From going through your last 500 mainspace edits, here are five instances in which a registered user (not an IP or an offensively named user) made a good-faith, non-vandalism edit which was reverted by Human without explanation:
- Afterwards restored by another bureaucrat:
- Heavy metal music, restored by Phantom Hoover and then again by Armondikov
- Southern strategy, restored by Nx
- Deepity, restored by Armondikov
- Not restored, but no explanation given:
- I am not defending the quality of these edits - whether they were good or not is not the point. Blue (is useful) 04:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sure I have. Awaiting diffs with bated breath! Bring it on! ħuman 03:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- You have reverted a number of my edits without explanation, for starters; several of which other editors later restored, if I recall. Diffs to follow. ListenerXTalkerX 03:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but a slapped wrist for what? No evidence has been presented. I move for summary dismissal on account of complete lack prosecutor's/plaintiff's case. ħuman 03:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Phantom Hoover about changing the page's name back, but I think a slapped wrist is a more adequate sanction for Human than desysopping. ListenerXTalkerX 03:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Lol. Compare what I improved and created over the last 24 hours to your incredibly important concerns. ħuman 04:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- "whether they were good or not is not the point" really? ħuman 04:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- (EC) Stop changing the subject. ListenerXTalkerX 04:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Stop changing the object. ħuman 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- (EC) New users don't give a flute about how many edits you've made, Human, all they see is your revert. Blue (is useful) 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Stop changing the object. ħuman 04:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- (EC) Stop changing the subject. ListenerXTalkerX 04:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Rename
Can we get this page renamed to "Lynch mob"? Because that would be awesome kthxbai. 24.13.203.96 (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)