G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

Tachyon energy

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Against allopathy

Alternative medicine

Icon alt med alt.svg
Unproven articles

Tachyon energy is a pseudoscientific concept used by proponents of holistic medicine.

[edit] Definition

The idea of "Tachyon energy" was proposed in a pseudoscientific book titled Tachyon Energy: A New Paradigm in Holistic Healing (1999) written by Gabriel Cousens and David Wagner, two proponents of spiritual medicine who pretended that they were doing science. In the book they claimed that "tachyon energy" can explain everything from acupuncture, chi, homeopathy, and reflexology to yoga and chakras.

Since the book was written many New agers have embraced the concept claiming that it has bridged the gap between science and spirituality.[1] Some have even set up websites to feed off the gullible to sell their "Tachyon energy" products.[2][3]

There is no scientific evidence that "Tachyon energy" exists and the energy has never been tested in any experiment. It is just another name for the belief in vitalism. It is no different than any other supposed metaphysical force such as Chi, prana or vril.

[edit] No relation to science

Tachyon Energy has no real relation to the hypothetical particle called a "tachyon" put forward by the physicist Gerald Feinberg, and which most physicists think cannot exist. Yet New Agers in hope of sounding more "scientific" in some of their books claim that there is a relation.[4]

[edit] Footnotes

Personal tools