Talk:Laci Green

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

External links?--ADtalkModerator 21:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I second it. Apparently, reducing the article to the lowest common denominator of information doesn't work. So, I figure it's best to go to Plan B. Plan B may involve a lot of viewing of the person's videos, comparing the older videos and younger videos, and acting like Laci Green's stalker for a while, trying to validate and cite the information on the article. 140.254.226.232 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
you go do that--MikallakiM 16:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
What in the bloody hell is going on here? EVDebs (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Some bon is going to stalk Laci Green for awhile because we have an article on her for no reason that doesn't cite anything.--Token Conservative (talk) 23:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Sounds like a pointless style nitpick. Since this isn't a formal paper, it seems reasonable to say "go watch her videos, see what we mean". At any rate, she's a prominent skeptic and sex educator, and there is a lot of woo surrounding sex. EVDebs (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
And when I tried to make an article on sex myths it was all undone.--Token Conservative (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
That don't seem right to me. We've got plenty of other stuff on sex ed and the like; a page on sex woo makes perfect sense here. EVDebs (talk) 05:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Except that his idea was to "merge" various existing articles into a single, focusless page.--ZooGuard (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
No, it actually wasn't.--Token Conservative (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Internet mobbing

Should we add how she was mobbed and threatened after apologizing for a past use of the word "tranny" back in 2012, as recounted here? — Unsigned, by: Mcc1789 / talk / contribs 22:35, 23 February 2014‎ (UTC)

If you do, please do your own legwork, don't rely on secondary sources. This also includes the framing.--ZooGuard (talk) 08:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
And it seems that the Jezebel piece is a tertiary source, being based on a piece from The Daily Dot.[1]--ZooGuard (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
That's depressing. Can anybody find her email? I'd like to offer her words of support, but I can't find it anywhere. (I suspect she may have taken it down due to the attacks...) Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 10:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Please note that it happened in mid-2012. :)--ZooGuard (talk) 11:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
wehpudicabok.readingComprehension = 0 Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 19:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support