Talk:Thomas

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Love it. Bondurant 11:51, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Dump it.

Delete[edit]

I motion to delete this "fork". Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

This "fork" has no purpose. What vaguely sensible person, for anything other than lulz, would search for "Thomas"—not Clarence Thomas, no Thomas Jefferson, just Thomas. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Please describe for me how this fork is any different from all the retarded redirects that Conservapedia insists on having. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:57, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

I second the motion to delete. I also move to delete the ridiculopolous category "railroad woo". ħumanUser talk:Human 00:30, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Eheh, I already did. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:37, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Don't forget to delete wherever Messr. Skwirrel added it... Ayn Rand, and maybe one other place? Choochoo! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:56, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Don't worry, that was the first thing I took care of. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:40, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Don't forget to delete the goat articles while you're at it. And somebody needs to send long-eared jerboa into oblivion too. Secret Squirrel 22:01, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Secret Squirrel, those are all established in-jokes. "Railroad woo" is not. And automotive woo is a legitimate category with a lame name. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:23, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
And here I thought I was the only one deleting that category (and banning the lame-ass guy last night) and having SS undo whatever I did... --Kels 22:25, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
RationalWiki: A team effort. Or, two teams' efforts. Or twelve, or thirteen. Hell, every beachrat for themselves! ħumanUser talk:Human 22:34, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
In-jokes are elitist, stupid, systemically discriminatory against people with Aspergers, usually incoherent, and elitist. Did I mention elitist? Secret Squirrel 22:35, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Not elitist - just survived the test of time. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:04, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
I have Asperger's, and I love our in-jokes. But it's true they are elitist.
Now you heard the man. Stop making goat jokes this instant! PURGE THE SITE OF GOATS! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:05, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
The goat is dead! Long live the goat! ħumanUser talk:Human 23:09, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Self-diagnosed (which is usually what most of them are) Aspies usually love in-jokes as long as they're their own. Maybe I should have said they are inherently discriminatory against people without Aspergers. And still elitist. Secret Squirrel 23:12, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
So can I be one? Or three? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:15, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
You're whatever you want to be. What you say is what you get. Secret Squirrel 23:26, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Then I am one, and I speak for all of us!!! ħumanUser talk:Human 23:55, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
"Self-diagnosed"? The only reason you would say would be if you think I'm one those "self-diagnosed". Which I am, if by "self-diagnosed" you mean, "My mother took me to the Child Development and Rehabilitation Center, where, after much testing, they told my horrified mother 'He has Asperger's Syndrome'." That kind of self-diagnosed? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:40, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I have Asperjism!!! I iz one Aspie. Pleez 2 not offend Me! Evah. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:49, 12 September 2008 (EDT)