What on Earth were you thinking?

Jump to navigation Jump to search

What on Earth were you thinking?

Seriously dude, WHAT were you thinking? I am really curious. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human03:19, 7 May 2011

I have since stopped caring about that.

ADK...I'll stir your daydream!13:14, 7 May 2011

Armondikov, I applaud your willingness to stand for what is right.

(((Zack Martin)))13:22, 7 May 2011
 

You attacked another user for no reason two days ago and now you "stopped caring about it"? Please explain yourself. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:24, 8 May 2011

Wow. Just as I was beginning to miss Human, he comes up with a perfect reason why most people don't.

SuspectedReplicant retire me01:31, 8 May 2011

SR, you make no sense whatsoever. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:41, 8 May 2011

No, it's really fucking obvious. Please explain your deliberate ignorance.

Blue (is useful)01:43, 8 May 2011

Blue, please say something coherent. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:46, 8 May 2011
 

Blue, please say something coherent. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:46, 8 May 2011
 

Human, please learn that you don't need to sign your comments on LQT pages. You're not that dim.

My reply was aimed at you turning up with a comment like "Please explain yourself" when you've done fuck all on the site in recent times. You're the one who should be explaining yourself. Stop bothering people about things you personally don't like.

SuspectedReplicant retire me01:44, 8 May 2011

I routinely sign wiki comments with them. Liquid threads is the problem, not my habit. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:46, 8 May 2011

You're so right. Only the other day I found myself stuffing hay into my car's petrol tank because we always used to feed horses to pull carriages. You can imagine my embarrassment!

SuspectedReplicant retire me01:51, 8 May 2011

SR, liquid threads is a disaster. It does not integrate with MW software, it's in beta, so fuck off. Now, is Armondikov going to answer my simple question or are the trolls going to bury this in stupidity? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:55, 8 May 2011

Ah - so it's LQT's fault that you can't learn how to use it. I hadn't realised stupidity could be transmitted through wiki software.

SuspectedReplicant retire me01:58, 8 May 2011
 

I agree with Huw. LT is like emulating a good apple product in windoze. It haz it's place, (and I do not think RW is that place), and werks like the people who do like it to werk. But over all it's clunky and annoying. C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ (Just for good measure). (Oh, I also don't like that there is no edit summary...I do some of mine best werk there)

C®ackeЯ02:07, 8 May 2011

No, Apple products are for people with more money than sense, but RW is the reverse.

SuspectedReplicant retire me02:08, 8 May 2011
 
 
 
 

SR, this has nothing to do with you, I asked Armondikov a reasonable question. Please mind your own business. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:48, 8 May 2011

I'm so terribly sorry. There I was assuming that because you posted in a publicly-viewable, publicly-editable forum, anybody could respond. If only there was some way in which you could communicate privately with someone when you only wanted responses from that person? Like clicking the "Email this user" button!

SuspectedReplicant retire me01:50, 8 May 2011

But your response was pointless. I asked Armondikov a simple question, that you can't answer, obviously. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human01:57, 8 May 2011

You decided to keep an argument going that had been over for some time and make it ADK's problem. I decided to make it your problem instead. What is your justification for demanding an answer from ADK?

SuspectedReplicant retire me02:01, 8 May 2011

SR, fuck off. I asked A. a question. You have nothing to contribute besides being a weird sort of asshole. I still await A.'s answer. Not your tripe. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human02:03, 8 May 2011

As Blue already commented, the answer is obvious. Your deliberate ignorance is an insult to the rest of us. All you are doing is perpetuating an argument that had finished of its own accord. Why are you doing that, Human? Why? What is your motivation for causing deliberate strife? What is your justification for - in your own words - "demanding" answers? To give you a taste of your own medicine: your answers are required NOW.

SuspectedReplicant retire me02:07, 8 May 2011
 

Yeah, SR, Troll. Honestly.

Blue (is useful)02:07, 8 May 2011

Blue, you are being less than useless. Me, a troll? Seriously? Get a grip.

ħumanUser talk:Human02:10, 8 May 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I don't agree with Human regarding the substance of this dispute, but honestly, whether he signs his LQT posts twice or not is rather irrelevant. --(((Zack Martin))) 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin))) 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin))) 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin))) 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

(((Zack Martin)))02:51, 8 May 2011

Mmm. Yes. Can't disagree, but I consider it my responsibility as a knowledgeable person to pass on any little bits of knowledge that others don't have. Since Human evidently didn't have the knowledge about not needing to sign LQT posts, I gave it to him. He then chose to pursue a rather wet path by ignoring the advice. That's entirely his decision, and one that I'm sure we all know how to interpret.

SuspectedReplicant retire me03:09, 8 May 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 

Here's my answer: I do not need to explain or justify myself to anyone, now get over yourself.