More mod bullshit.

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Blue
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You deleted on page, and protected another. No chance for either side to discuss. again, i get it was a petty "i hate a particular user" but at the same time, blue, the very actions like that are what make us say "wait, what's going on." at least in my view. shrugs...

Pink mowse.pngGodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll.20:26, 9 November 2011

The protection was an hour-long measure to forestall the edit war. I deleted the page to restore the status quo ante. None of that is bias for a particular side, and promotes discussion by ending the wheel war.

Blue (is useful)20:28, 9 November 2011
 

It is quite amazing that my very presence throws Nx into episodes of rage, rights abuse and general douchebaggery.

Aceace20:29, 9 November 2011

I've always figured you and Nx are socks of eachother, just out to give us all something to argue about when the day is too long. ;-)

Pink mowse.pngGodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll.20:34, 9 November 2011

"I've always figured you and Nx are socks of each other." No, Blue is good at her job, open to criticsm, and not rage-driven and selfish. It's hard to fake that Nx's level of incompetence.

B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic20:36, 9 November 2011

Not blue. Ace! he's the sox. or nx is the sox. ;-) Actually, there are moments in life i think you all are one giant sock built for my annoyance. then I wake up :-)

Blue's decisions on how to be a mod annoy me. But i'm trying to remember that BLUE herself is not what annoys me. And that she is doing what she thinks is right, and does listen.

but like i said elsewhere... i'm as petty as the next guy or gal here, especially if it's something that "annoys" me.

Pink mowse.pngGodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll.20:39, 9 November 2011
 

Pay attention. She was talking about Ace and me.

-- Nx / talk20:39, 9 November 2011
 

Fun times: Somebody that quit the job because he didn't like what came with it saying somebody else is bad at it. Even if I'm not envolved just watching the drama ensue can be entertaining.

ʤɱ constructivist20:50, 9 November 2011

E-mailed threats of a violent and abusive nature come with the job? They should put that in the description, then.

B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic20:52, 9 November 2011

Yeah, because that was a thing they knew before the job was ever created...

ʤɱ constructivist20:55, 9 November 2011
 

If being entertained by non-sequitors is your kind of thing, more power to you. Foster didn't like email harassment he received. That's got nothing to do with whether criticisms of Nx's conduct have merit, nor does it affect Foster's credibility.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg20:54, 9 November 2011

No, of course it's not a valid argument, but I noticed the irony and was entertained by it. Not everything people say is to make a point.

ʤɱ constructivist21:27, 9 November 2011

You're doing it again. What irony?

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg22:44, 9 November 2011

My first post in this section should have explained it. If that doesn't work for you, don't waste your time with it.

ʤɱ constructivist23:23, 9 November 2011

Yeah. So. It explains you wanted to take a shot at Bflat but won't admit you weren't doing it right. You're right. This was a complete waste of time.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg23:38, 9 November 2011

You really think everything somebody says has to has some hint of an agenda, right? That's… just sad.

OK once again, for the slow ones out there (see, that was a shot): I was not making any point, I was commenting on something I saw a irony. Bb has been, since he ditched his old persona, acting like giant dick taking shots at other people. In my mind if you can take shots at others, you have to be able to take them. And it seems so he could.

ʤɱ constructivist00:00, 10 November 2011

You're pretty clueless. Show me where I've flooded other users' e-mails with disjointed and profanity-filled rants in which I threatened to do them harm, because that was what I was dealing with. If you don't know what you're talking about, then do everyone, not least yourself, a favor and mind your own business.

B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic00:05, 10 November 2011

I see the We-want-to-understand-you-wrong-so-we-can-talk-bad-about-you-machinery is in full effect. Well, either that you you're having temporary neurological failure of some kind. Besides those two options I see no reason how one can understand "taking a shot at so." as "flooding other users email accounts with disjointed rants" and not as "making a joke on someone elses expense".

ʤɱ constructivist00:26, 10 November 2011

Look, you're obviously having an integrity problem here so go take a break and see if you can figure out how to stop throwing around insults when you've been called on just fucking getting it wrong. There was no "irony" to comment on. You're acting like a giant cunt and insulting Bflat because that makes you uncomfortable makes you an even bigger cunt.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg00:45, 10 November 2011

Facepalm

ʤɱ constructivist00:50, 10 November 2011

This is still going on?

Fuck the Moderators

Aceace01:04, 10 November 2011

This is funny. UHM thinks he can flail his way to having not said something ridiculous. I've got plenty of time to teach him. I'll check in in a few hours.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg01:06, 10 November 2011

Any chance you guys can take this off my talk page sometime soon, or...?

Blue (is useful)01:25, 10 November 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I'm actually a very clever bot of Nx's. He programmed me to have romantic feelings for him.

Blue (is useful)20:38, 9 November 2011