Christian economics

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Possibly because it contradicted the previous sentence.

ТySerious Business Guy10:47, 14 March 2012

Pretty much, yeah. I said so in the comments.

Pink mowse.pngGodotoi, putain, genial, merci16:13, 14 March 2012

Here's what's funny, if that's an acceptable adjective. Look at what you wrote here:

Defined differently Christian economics is closer to liberation theology and argues that Jesus valued the poor, also Christians have a duty to share what they have.[1]

vs. what you just said: I carefully explained that there are kinder Christians who give a left wing message to what Jesus is reported as saying. You took that part of what I wrote out.

--- can you really not see how what you put into the article is nothing like what you just said here? You constantly miss things like "who is saying things" "what are they saying" and "why". Why did you not say "However, not all christians agree with this definition. Some, kindger Christians give a left wing message...." It suddenly explains why you make a contradiction. It explains who the parties are, etc.

You've said you're an academic. So read what you write, critically, as if you had not been the one to write it. Does it make sense as written?

  1. Jesus on Money This advocates a different system based on Christians sharing what they have, (Christian Socialism?)
Pink mowse.pngGodotoi, putain, genial, merci16:17, 14 March 2012

The article, which I found today, is worse than bad, it is (was) blatantly offensive, and written very childishly.

Proxima, no one is "[finding] excuses to get at [you]" - I've been saying this for years now, nicely sometimes and not so nicely others - your writing style is awful and your anti-religious (especially anti-Christian) screeds are often clueless. Cleaning up after you on this wiki is a tiresome chore I would wish upon no one, and if we had the tools, I would have worked with them to exclude you from article editing here years ago. But we don't, so we have to repair the damage you do as best we can, and then endure your insults when we remove or discuss your incredibly poor (in general) contributions. Sifting through the crap you add to save the occasional good wikilink is a dog's job. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

ħumanUser talk:Human03:44, 20 March 2012
  1. In what way is Christian economics] offensive or bad?
  2. To me it looks like a good article written to university standard.
  3. Incidentally I wrote hardly any of it, others notably Godot wrote most of it.
Proxima Centauri (talk)08:27, 20 March 2012
  1. That's not your revision but Nebby's
  2. When other people write it perhaps. Your writing, however, is on the lower elementary school level.
  3. And its not their contributions we're complaining about.
Тycommunications wire13:09, 20 March 2012

That's right, Human complained about someone else's revision.

Proxima Centauri (talk)15:07, 20 March 2012

I give up. It's like talking to a wall.

Тyrannosaurs15:10, 20 March 2012

A wall that happens to be able to pass a Turing test.

Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.17:30, 20 March 2012

In this same interlude it doth befall That I, one Snout by name, present a wall; And such a wall, as I would have you think, That had in it a crannied hole or chink, (Wall holds up two fingers)

Pink mowse.pngGodot What do cats dream about?17:59, 20 March 2012
Proxima Centauri (talk)18:54, 20 March 2012

"Well played, Wall". "Well shone, Moon".

Pink mowse.pngGodot What do cats dream about?18:55, 20 March 2012