Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ace McWicked"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 622961 by Psygremlin (Talk) Go away)
m (Reverted edits by AceMcWanker1 (Talk) to last version by Psygremlin)
Line 195: Line 195:
 
:Fuck yeah, I want one. [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>X-102</sup>]] 22:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:Fuck yeah, I want one. [[User:Ace McWicked|Ace]][[User Talk:Ace McWicked|<sup>X-102</sup>]] 22:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::I love quoting out of context: "Advocates for Animals and Alcohol Focus" sounds like a great name for an activist group. "Do you beat your dog when you drink too much?  We can help!" {{User:Human/sig|}} 00:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::I love quoting out of context: "Advocates for Animals and Alcohol Focus" sounds like a great name for an activist group. "Do you beat your dog when you drink too much?  We can help!" {{User:Human/sig|}} 00:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 
== Hi ==
 
 
Hello. [[User:AceMcWanker|AceMcWanker]] ([[User talk:AceMcWanker|talk]]) 08:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 10:57, 24 July 2010


Archives


insert attention grabbing title here

insert rude joke here, insert friendly welcome, add on a happy greeting and something along the lines of "just bugging you". ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ revolving ax murderers! 03:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

That's when I said "Psychotic tendencies be damned!" and I haven't taken any medication since. Acei9 03:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI

...it suggests that alcoholism starts to wreak damage in the brain after a relatively short amount of time. It starts to kill off the hippocampus’s neurons while nixing its ability to make more. This double-whammy could explain many of the mental problems that regular binge-drinkers experience. Most intriguingly of all, the turnover of neurons in the hippocampus affects our learning and memory skill... That's why I never made Prime Minister. 22:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Meh, I coulda told you that without any of your expensive magaziney web site whinging! ħumanUser talk:Human 05:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Pfffffft that only happens to other people. Acei9 22:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Must you ax for more?

Nutty Roux (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wHEoMpMvz7A&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"

PS - ACE TIENE MACHISMO Nutty Roux (talk) 06:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBSzSB_1GLg ħumanUser talk:Human 12:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

err? Acei9 12:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

A certain someone

I'd rather they go after me than somebody who might actually give a fuck. I find them, instead, to be absolutely hilarious and entertaining to fight with (it's the sadist in me). AnarchoGoon Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living 05:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I think the term you're looking for is "masochist". And now I have visions of a mohawked rocker cackling, "Dance for me my little trolls!" maniacally over his keyboard. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Well that's good, because that's essentially the case. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 05:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I want not approve on it. I think polite post. Acei9 05:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Stop being so fucking useful or I'll start a rumoure that you are a glovepuppet of Mei III! ħumanUser talk:Human 06:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Earlobing Gin

So how'd it actually go? Did you get drunk or just an ear ache? I could imagine you going to the doctor complaining of one and endeavouring to explain shooting gin in your ear. For most people that'd be a weird thing, but presumably you've called him up for more obscure things than that, i.e. finger stuck in a toaster, or wounds sustained from a badger. SJ Debaser 10:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

You forgot the little car model in a condom he stuck up his bum. ħumanUser talk:Human 10:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Little hasty

Binning a user for asking how the site works? Though it's probably MC anyway, so who cares. -- Nx / talk 23:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

it from europe so it probably is mc. Cheerleader Not Troll (talk) 23:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't think so at all - the main page has been continuously blanked and if said user wants to complain they can do so in 25 minutes and they'll unblocked and apologized to and explained why. Acei9 23:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Guilty until proven otherwise? -- Nx / talk 23:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh, never mind, I see they are just a vandal, guess it's a-ok then. -- Nx / talk 23:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
lol, ya, don't worry.

I can see your house from up here

New Aceland.JPG

- π 00:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Are you coming to visit? Acei9 01:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
No, it was on the way home. Due to bad weather conditions they decided not to go the usual Antarctic route and instead cope the tax for flying over New Zealand. It is the Southern Island about 90 miles south of Mount Cook. - π 01:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, just so you know I don't actually live on top Mount Cook. Acei9 01:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Really? There is a small town in the valley there, I imagined that is where you all lived. I assume all that white stuff are the sheep. - π 01:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I live in Wellington and the other 2 live in Auckland. South Island is where the orcs and hobbits live. We don't go there. Acei9 01:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
That was literally the first time in my life I had ever seen snow (granted I was 13 km up in the air). It was weird, it was cloudy from Buenos Aires right across the Pacific and then suddenly the clouds cleared and there was New Zealand. Once we passed it got cloudy again. I got to meet the rest of your countrymen and women in the customs queue at Sydney. I was only slightly surprised to see two queues, one for Australian and New Zealanders, and then just the generic other people queue for immigration. I got a special queue in Argentina with the Yanks and Canadians, but that is because they wanted to fine us for being citizens of those countries, everyone else got free entry. - π 01:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
How did you find Buenos Aires? Did you notice that there is dog-shit everywhere and that wine is very cheap? Acei9 01:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I got caught by the dog-shit on my first day, I used that stupid arse sink thing in my hotel room for cleaning my shoes. I maxed out my duty-free import one top shelf wine that was about A$12 a bottle. I spent the last of my pesos on Cuban cigars, I don't smoke but double corona for less than A$3 each I would be crazy to pass that up. - π 01:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Post me the cigars. Acei9 01:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I think I'll give them to my brother, he doesn't smoke really either, but I think he has enjoyed the odd Cuban in the past. I got the weirdest attitudes with them. The dude who checked my bag in Argentina complimented them, the guy in quarantine gave me attitude for having "poison". The bit that shitted me off was the only thing they confiscated my biscuits. They told me I could mail them back, if I had thought about it I should have mailed them to the girl that worked the counter at the hotel who's mouth hit the floor when I brought them back from shopping, but now they are being "destroyed", e.g, eaten by the quarantine officers. - π 02:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I have never been stopped at customs. I came back from South American with a cannabis stained wooden pipe in my bag. I completely forgot it was there and freaked out a bit when I found I had been through customs with it. Foolishly I didn't take it out of my bag though and some months later when on a plane home from Johannesburg I realized I still had the fucking thing in my bag. Acei9 02:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I filled out my declaration form correctly, so my luggage got a going over as a result. If you don't declare anything it is pretty much pot luck if you get searched or not. The highlight had to be getting bomb searched by this Pakistani guy though. We were having a chat about his up coming trip back home. It was only long afterwards that the irony of it occurred to me. - π 02:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I got explosive tested at JFK in New York and drug tested in Norfolk Island because I got so hammered on the aeroplane that I couldn't fill out my declaration form. Customs took a look at the gibberish I had scribbled on the form and asked me what I did for a living. When I couldn't remember they tested my wallet for drug traces. Acei9 02:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
So you did a Boony? What is the deal with Norfolk Island, is it part of Australia or not? - π 02:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Australia I think, it uses Aussie currency. Acei9 05:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Gin

So, based on your ear drinking experiment, which brand of gin goes down the ear canal best? Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 19:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

aSK, section removed

I have removed that section - sorry - you didnt seem to be getting anywhere. Hamster (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I am getting somewhere. Acei9 06:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
You're getting nowhere. Philip J. Rayment is incapable of conceding a single point that's critical to his Biblical Worldview™. And so all he's going to do until the day he dies is continue lying for Jesus. His most recent post on your userpage is a sickening display of just how completely dishonest a shitbag he is, claiming he has any business debating science because it's a "worldview" debate and that he wins because his opponents indulge logical fallacies and whatever other buzzwords he cares to throw out. What you need to do to actually get somewhere important is make a clearer case that Rayment's rhetorical style is typical of fundies in general. They have no special interest in truth except when it doesn't interfere with their program of buttressing their fragile faith in a ghost whose existence is fundamentally unprovable. So they'll indulge the familiar fallacy of fallacies (Rayment is a pro at this one), feign personal indignation and hurl tu quoques in order to avoid the substance of a discussion (again, Rayment's a pro), and do whatever else they can to keep the discussion meta. (Just look at how at the heart of things Rayment continues to stick with his original claims about "nothing" from the single article he read and the others he quotemined) Did you notice that you only started getting long responses from that lying sack of shit once you'd written enough for him to put the strategy I just outlined into action? I tested him yesterday with (a) a simple observation that his claim that the bible is evidence of his god is circular and (b) a personal observation that he's an arrogant blowhard. I got a month block. He's permitted to state over and over and over against the the "anti-creationists" never offer any reasonable argument, yet when we say something similar it's an impermissible attack. His first impulse is to deny there's any substance to what your saying by any means possible then comb it for any basis for claiming that you've attacked him or his CMI buddies personally so he can scream "ad hom!" I gave him both a substantive observation (his claim was circular) and a personal insult and he took the bait admirably. What's odd is that CPalmer engaged in identical conduct, including calling me a dunderhead, but not so much as a single word will be said to discipline him because he's a creationist. He's been around long enough to see what others do to get blocked for a month. When he does exactly the same thing I did and nothing happens you really have to wonder what's going on. Or not. So when you think you're having a reasoned discussion, and it even appears that Rayment is speaking at least a similar language, you need to step back and look at what he's really doing: evangelism and apologetics. Neither of these things is particularly concerned with empirical truth. Both implicitly rely on assuming the very conclusion of the syllogism (the existence of a god) as evidence for this god's works. We can't let them have their meta-conversation without us exposing the dishonesty inherent in the very manner in which they debate. It's not just the facts they have wrong but the very ways logic, matters of proof and evidence, and burdens of persuasion work. And it's no mystery that these subjects are raised extraordinarily frequently, not by us, but by the creationist liars attempting to deflect attention from their own deceit by claiming that we're the ones engaging logical fallacies. ÑR/Señor Admin/Hablar 18:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, he is a complete shit bag. Acei9 20:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh, snap. Acei9 02:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh, Nutty... I forget how... angry you get when you talk about Phillip... *bites lip sexually* SJ Debaser 21:30, 4 July 2010
Skype soon you pack of witless turds? ÑR/Señor Admin/Talk 22:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
No can do - at work. AceLiquid Room 22:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
You're as bad a liar as the creationist scum. I can see you right now sitting on your sofa in your underwear drinking a 20 oz bottle of lager. I like you. Come talk to me. ÑR/Señor Admin/Talk 23:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Nope that was yesterday. Now its 11:40am and i am sitting my 7th floor office with the heater on and nursing a hangover. Numb tongue, pounding head and rolling stomach. AceLiquid Room 23:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Now see what you've done, you got honesty all over his nice clean wiki. He'll just have to tidy that up a bit. --Kels (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

He's lovely, isn't he? 17:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
Its unbelievable! He continues to argue that all the scientists are wrong without checking any of the supporting material! AceLiquid Room 20:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
They disagree with the bibble - ergo they are WRONG! 20:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
Its is extremely dishonest behaviour. AceLiquid Room 21:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
And again I fall back on my earlier hypothesis, that it's physically painful for a Creationist to give a direct, honest answer to any question. So far, Philip's behavior seems to bear that out. --Kels (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
As Nutty said to me, it wasn't until I gave him enough dialouge to implent his stratergy (Log. fallacy, tq etc) that he was even able to answer. AceLiquid Room 10:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

You're right

this is fun. I think I feel a new RW game coming on. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 13:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

There we go. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 13:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

You are correct

I would approve of you telling someone with the personality of a wife-beater and/or child abuser to go fuck themselves, except I'd say with the tallest cactus for dessert. AnarchoGoon Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living 07:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

You eat cactus with your dessert? I like a little peyote with dinner myself. AceLiquid Room 07:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Yup, peyote is goo eating. Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 07:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Ace

Things have gone to hell since I quit drawing attention to your site. [1] Still got your head up your ass? nobsdon't bother me 03:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

What the hell are you talking about? Why do I care? Head up my ass? RobSmith. AceLiquid Room 03:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Umm, we have changed the domain name; it is now rationalwiki.org, that is why rationalwiki.com is trailing off. - π 03:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! PWNED!!!! AceLiquid Room 03:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith RobSmith AceLiquid Room 03:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Rationalwiki.org [2] still sucks. So you get promoted from #147,000 to #259,000. Congratulations. nobsdon't bother me 03:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Go back to your Machismo site then. Run along now. AceLiquid Room 03:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
(EC)Let me explain this to you. First of all, Alexa uses estimated data as it can't track everyone, only those that use the Alexa toolbar and I would like to think we attract more intelligent people than those that browse the internet with a huge security hole being opened up by a third-party installation. Second of all our traffic is being split by those that use rationalwiki.org and those that use rationalwiki.com. The toolbar only records the address you type in, not where you get redirect to. So to get out true taffic you would have to add the two together as it treats them as different sites. Dumbass. - π 03:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't be a dumbass, Π. Things have gone to hell since I quit drawing attention to your site. It was ALL Rob's doing. AceLiquid Room 03:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Which was coincidentally the same time we changed domains. That spike corresponds to the last time we got slashdotted. - π 03:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Uh huh. Can't plug the leak. Sounds like crank science the way it's explained. nobsdon't bother me 03:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Website traffic estimation is a crank science. If you want the actual data ask Trent. - π 03:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
And why are posting on page? I don't give a fuck, if you wanna talk web rankings talk to Ken. AceLiquid Room 03:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
You drove the traffic down after I brought the slashdot effect and you don't give a fuck. And how was I thanked? nobsdon't bother me 03:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
With this RobSmith - π 03:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Nobs: sadly I'm the first pee pee to point this out: We Don't Care. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Yahbutt is Soros gonna give up the bucks if the traffic doesn't come in? nobsdon't bother me 01:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Can you move this off my fucking page please? AceLiquid Room 01:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok Ace, you win. Remember this advice: (a) Stand with your back to the wind; (b) Aim high; (c) Watch out for your shoes. nobsdon't bother me 02:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
OK, bye now. AceLiquid Room 02:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Take pride in your accomplishments

In this case, creating epic butthurt. --Kels (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

That wasn't me, that was Teh Asp (I am on phone with him now). AceLiquid Room 21:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, take credit for it anyway. It makes me laugh, it's so transparent and generally awful. --Kels (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
The first thing I thought was if the Mormons, during discussion, said "Well, here is a book that supports what I say - just read this sentence" and PJR refused to read it but still claimed there was no evidence to support their claim or, alternatively, read and said "that's not what it means/that sentence doesn't support what you are say" how would the mormons have reacted then? AceLiquid Room 21:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't know what he's bitching about, if he and his wife (Lowkey?)put up a tent in the village square and claimed it was their house. --Kels (talk) 21:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Just changing tac a little, check this out, Kels. AceLiquid Room 22:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Pretty incredible. I'm only just starting to comprehend just how much work went into that, and it's staggering. I believe I saw another one of theirs, not as impressive as this but still quite something, that took place entirely within a single courtyard. --Kels (talk) 00:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Pretty cool, eh. AceLiquid Room 00:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Tea candles

PI confirmed. ÑR/Señor Admin/Talk 02:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Deviant

I ask again,
Why do you block me.
Is it because I display your sickening sexual urges
For the world to see
Or is it more sinister than that? Ha (talk) 09:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
If Ace
Displays deviant
Tendencies then
He
Hides it well. Scarlet A.pngmoral 10:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Mmmmm.

a small gift....

...the great man's birthday. Res ipsa loquitur. ho ho. P-Foster (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Errr, thanks for the 404. Mahalo. AceX-102 03:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
fixed. stupid wiki-coding. P-Foster (talk) 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Nice. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Got this for Xmas a few years back. AceX-102 03:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ace

I like you and we should get coffee sometime. The Emperor — Unsigned, by: 86.40.201.1 / talk / contribs 21:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I drink coffee. Meet me at The Matterhorn in Cuba Street at about 1:30pm this afternoon? AceX-102 20:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Nice try Marcus. Besides, everybody knows I'd go drink with ace, not get coffee. --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 20:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to meet Marcus so I could make fun of his fat rolls and social awkwardness. AceX-102 20:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to meet Ace so I could point out that secretly everybody laughs at him and thinks he's a ludicrous person. And by the way I am suave, not socially awkward. I get more blowjobs than you get hot dinners. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
How many blowjobs you had this week Marcus becuase I have had 5 hot dinners so far. AceX-102 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Well obviously since I have more blowjobs than you have hot dinners then obviously I have had 6 totally awesome blowjobs this week. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 21:59, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Marcus, putting peanut butter on your dick and getting the dog to lick it off does not count as a blowjob. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
damn, I only had 3. You win. AceX-102 22:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Crundy, masturbating over your own faeces and then swallowing your own ejaculate does not allow you to have an opinion. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Why not? Have you SEEN how sexy my poop is? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I would imagine given your immense obesity you would produce lifesized faeces and thus are capable of enjoying intercourse with. Though this still disqualifies you from being a legitimate human being. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Only a real man can produce shit as manly enough as Crundy can. SJ Debaser 22:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Indeed. I do wonder where MC's image of me being really obese comes from. Do you want me to be fat, MC? Do you want to feed me KFC until I'm too big to get away from you so you can have your way with me? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Crundy; I know that you are morbidly obese. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Crundy produces the shit of kings. And yes, MC is a feeder. AceX-102 22:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
MC, what's my BMI? I'd love to know. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Crundy; I know what your BMI is. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Crundy; I don't know what your BMI is, because I'm not a freak that dreams about people on the internet regularly. SJ Debaser 22:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Superjosh; I know what you dream about. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm bored of this now graham. I'm just going to grab a few sheets of bogroll and wipe my talk page clean now. I cba tbh kthbye. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
No Crundy, no! We were in the throes of one of our regular insult exchanges. This was rather tame. 86.40.101.160 (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
MC, I don't know what you dream. This is going with the assumption that you get any chance to sleep, what with the infinite blowjobs and all. SJ Debaser 22:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Booze

So bizzare I couldn't help but think of you! [3] CrundyTalk nerdy to me 22:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Fuck yeah, I want one. AceX-102 22:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I love quoting out of context: "Advocates for Animals and Alcohol Focus" sounds like a great name for an activist group. "Do you beat your dog when you drink too much? We can help!" ħumanUser talk:Human 00:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)