G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

Fossil record

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
We're all homos here


Icon evolution.svg
Relevant Hominidae
A Gradual Science
Plain Monkey Business

The fossil record is the list of all fossils which chart the course of evolution throughout time. It is one of the most significant pieces of supporting evidence to the idea that evolution is a rational and real explanation for the origin of the diversity of species. In general, it refers to all fossils that have been excavated, examined and characterized so far by hundreds if not thousands of hardworking scientists and palaeontologists over the last few hundred years. The fossil record is used as evidence for many of things, including common descent, mass extinctions, the Cambrian explosion and the fact that the Earth is considerably older than 6000 years.

At the same time, the fossil record is yet another thing which shows that creationist ideas are untenable. Creationists like to claim that there are no transitional fossils (fossils that fill the "gaps" between one species and another) in the fossil record. This is probably because if one was presented to them, they would point out that there are two new gaps either side of it for which no transitional forms exist. Either that, or they are convinced that the fossil record is a hoax. But to scientists working on real research, the fossil record is a vital piece of evidence to study.

This creationist's cartoon is stupid and not even wrong.

Due to the relative rarity of fossil formation (with factors such as time, location and pure luck governing what we can see), and the natural destruction of rock that holds fossils, it is unlikely that the fossil record will ever be 100% complete and comprehensive. Creationists don't understand this, and think that the absence of a single fossil disproves evolution outright. Scientists, and palaeontologists do understand how fossilisation works; noting that we can derive a lot of information from what we do have rather than dwelling on the information that we don't have/haven't found yet.

[edit] See also

Evonav-left.jpg   Evolution Articles on RationalWiki   Evonav-right.jpg
Acceptance  -  Cladistics  -  Common descent: the incontrovertible evidence  -  De-evolution  -  Dinosaur  -  Eugenics  -  EvoWiki  -  Evobabble  -  Evolution  -  Human  -  Macroevolution  -  Microevolution  -  Natural selection  -  Niche  -  Palaeos  -  Phylogenetics  -  Phylogeny  -  Signal detection theory  -  Social Darwinism  -  Stephen Jay Gould  -  Theory of Evolution  -  Uncommon Descent  -
Personal tools