User talk:FAMAS

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Welcome

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, FAMAS!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

FuzzyCatPotato of the Conservative Leukemias (talk/stalk) 14:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please sign talk page entries using four tildes like this: ~~~~ or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png, on the toolbar above the edit panel. Thank you. Pippa (talk) 16:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

[edit] What's all this?

Why are you posting links to your newly created forum on everyone's talk pages? --JorisEnter (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop. CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Canvassing recently active users on their talk pages looks like spam, and is a good way to be ignored. The forum you started is attracting eyeballs. Why not give it a chance to develop at a natural pace, without trying to force it? CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Specially when you don't sign/date. Signing is polite and being undated archiving bots won't work. Pippa (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@CamelCasePragmatist and Pippa:this user is performing the manual advertising for purposes of augmentation of the cause. this user was not aware of the lack of autosignbot.FAMAS (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This fucking user is a twat! Pippa (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
This user has been vandal binned to avoid such useless cans of cooked pork meat.--JorisEnter (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Sign your posts

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Unbinned

No more cans of cooked pork meat anymore, please.--JorisEnter (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Listen

Stop the fucking "this user" and "user:[USERNAME]" stuff now. You're doing a splendid job of making pretty much everybody around here hate you.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome again

Hope to see more edits like your one on Bangladesh! Most users don't seem to appreciate your style of suggesting changes, but that may change if you keep up the good work! :) FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 19:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

This user is requesting to User:FuzzyCatPotato to remove this user from vandal binFAMAS (talk) 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
And you've already used "this user" twice in a single line of text. Do it again ans I'll ban you, following a Fibonacci sequence (1 day, 1 day, 2, 3, 5 etc).--JorisEnter (talk) 13:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
No bans, but please: use "I" rather than "this user". Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 15:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
He's been told to stop using "this user" at least five times by now. Have a look at my talk page and the corresponding archive, or scroll through FAMAS's contributions. He also appears to have a hard time understanding proper English capitalisation and sentence structure, despite having been asked repeatedly to make his posts a bit more readable.--JorisEnter (talk) 15:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Food woo

I reverted your edits because 1) some were sloppy, 2) some made specific claims without referencing any sources (though the article could use quite a few more already), and 3) some made no sense ("in both medical and aesthetical meaning of the word"... huh?). If you re-edit, add some references and make sure your syntax and grammar is correct. That way everyone wins. B) talk 06:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

You tried to undo the revert without even fixing grammar and capitalization. You'll keep getting reverted if your edits are of poor quality. B) talk 18:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
What he said. Stop the silly edits, please.--JorisEnter (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
You know, it doesn't actually seem like s?he's being malicious or deliberately vandalizing. Maybe not a native English speaker. The edits in the second paragraph seem kind of silly, but noting that woomeisters can both promote and criticize food unreasonably is, er, reasonable. In hopes of ending this I've put that bit in myself. B) talk 20:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
And the paragraph already makes that point, so it makes sense to reflect it in the "Examples include" sentence. B) talk 20:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

You did it again. Your edits contained mistakes and added very little of value to the sentences you changed. Can we talk about this? Please? B) talk 22:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: "this user asserts the fact that it is not woo if it is scientific, thus the sentence scheme was entirely erroneous and thus has been corrected." Nowhere does the existing sentence assert that woo is scientific. The statement, "food woo takes those confirmed, testable, correlative studies and turns them into..." does not imply that scientific studies on the topic of food are woo, nor that woo is scientific. It implies that woo purports to use science to make unfounded claims. Sure, there are probably clearer ways to state this, but the point stands regardless. Also, woo and science are not necessarily entirely disjoint. Woo often involves things like quote mining from real scientific studies in order to support a fraudulent claim. B) talk 22:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
in reply to user Bshaw, this user is currently on roaming mode and additionally, vandal binned, thus hampering the ability to perform conversations on rationalwiki.FAMAS (talk) 16:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

[edit] This User

...should stop using the phrase "this user". Nobody likes it, you sound like a goddamn Freeman on the Land with that nonsense. CorruptUser (talk) 14:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

This user was thinking the same thing. Legalese, HOOO! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Fammy-baby, the main issue for me (having read your recent essay) is that your 'this user' shtick makes what you are trying to say very difficult to read. The effort I'll spend on interpreting obtuse text is directly proportional to how much I expect to gain from bothering: based on your contributions so far I'd suggest an effort to make your posts as easy to read as possible. Unless of course you're just a bit of a weird troll, in which case keep up the good work. MyHatIsBread (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Troll Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
No, seriously, cut that shit out. Wretching up bile isn't good for me. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

[edit] You have been removed from the vandal bin.

Please try not to spam the wiki. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 14:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Good job so far! :) oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 18:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Please sign your posts

The signbot is currently out of service. It's just four tildes -- not much work. Thank you. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 03:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Why?

Could you just explain why you choose third person, every time, all the time? Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 07:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

He'll reply to you in the third person, you know. Facepalm.png Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Creating several unfinished templates

Would it be possible for you to experiment with making them in a sandbox instead? Thanks! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

[edit] This user

Stop with the "this user" stuff. Christopher (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

As the User page consists of a link to their contributions, what do you expect? 31.51.114.124 (talk) 11:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Many people can't think of anything to put on their userpage. You don't have to say "this user" all the time though, it gets really annoying after a while. Christopher (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
You can say 'Hi, there, I am (your name) and I am a Rationalwikian. (and my interests are)'

And at least very the term used, so the most you can be accused of is pretension/hipsterism. 31.51.114.124 (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools