Mommy instinct

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Style over substance

Pseudoscience

Icon pseudoscience.svg
Popular pseudosciences
Random examples
Mommy instinct is the concept that women who are pregnant or have given birth will somehow automatically know how to care for themselves and their children, better than any doctor or expert or family member who may have already experienced what the mother is dealing with. Sometimes, they can even extend this advice to other people or others' children. The concept is a combination of both the appeal to nature and appeal to no authority fallacies with sprinklings of bad appeals to common sense.

Contents

[edit] A dangerous idea

If a woman is experiencing a problem with their own children or pregnancy, they aren't supposed to ask advice from experts who know what they're talking about; they're supposed to "listen" to their own instincts and make what (they think) is the best decision. The problem is that even after listening to instinct, they might still not have the answer, so they ask people who aren't experts, like the Pearls or nutritionists. At worst, they will elect to not seek help when the circumstances become the most dire, like during a child's epileptic seizure or an ectopic pregnancy.

[edit] Who buys the woo

Appealing to mommy instinct covers a broad number of areas of the wooniverse, including chemophobia, anti-vaccine hysteria, alternative medicine, nature woo, food woo, homeschooling and many other types of anti-intellectualism.[1] As such, it is promoted quite heavily on various social media sites such as Facebook and Pinterest by woomeisters who sell self help books and remedies to the gullible and those who don't want to be taken for sheeple.

[edit] Religious implications

Without calling it "instinct", some religions appeal to maternalism through their rhetoric or dogma. In Christianity, the maternal "instinct" is the calling all women must follow, painted by joy[2]. Christianity as well as other Abrahamic religions also use childbirth as punishment for original sin and therefore an obligation, an idea that makes the anti-choice crowd happy. In this mindset, it's a woman's responsibility to give birth, thereby making them useful to the rest of society—a notion very admirable to the patriarchy.

Certain pagan religions, appealing to matriarchal concepts, state that a woman's power is in her uterus, since they're the ones who carry a pregnancy to term, suffer the ultimate pains of childbirth[3], and actually bring a new life into the world; therefore, they are stronger than the mens.[4] The cults involved in the goddess movement also use childbirth to define a woman's worth, albeit from a somewhat ironic feminist perspective.

[edit] Ironically...

There are currently studies on birthing positions by the World Health Organization suggesting that the lithotomy (lying on the back), while making the medical personel´s job easier, is the most painful and damaging for the mother. The WHO suggests letting the mother choose the position she feels the most confortable with[5].

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. Vaccines, Anti-Intellectualism and the Mommy Instinct, on Skepchick
  2. John 16:21
  3. Well, not quite
  4. Never mind that conception also (normally) requires a male contribution, or the differences in musculoskeletal structures among the sexes.
  5. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools