User talk:CheeseburgerFace

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>


[edit] Nice try trying to get me to log out

-ᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 19:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

It fooled me into logging out...--WMS (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
You probably should at least change it a bit since it nearly fooled me, but people did this back at MarioWiki and it later became against the rules. Some people don't take too kindly to fake templates... --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
a template for it has existed since June 2015 (it also says it's "stolen from Raysenn" meaning it's actually been around even longer). I reckon it's here to stay. Christopher (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
The template is an example of cross-site request forgeryWikipedia's W.svg (OWASP has a better article). The template is a more innocent (and legal) form of the ones you find in the wild. RW should fix the exploit, but the server has enough problems as it is.—CheeseburgerFace (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Just because it's there for a year and RationalWiki doesn't disallow it, and other people have used it, and it's a harmless prank (and I don't think it's an exploit lol, it's just toying around with wikicode), some might find it annoying and even unwelcome. Anyhow, just warning you in advance. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Not an exploit? While the template exploit is innocent, there's definitely more malicious actions that can be done with the method. For example, I could have made the URL make the clicker ban a member on the wiki. The ability for a clicked URL to make any logged-in user perform an undesired action is an exploit. A more extreme example is linking to a Netflix URL that makes Netflix users buy a movie they don't want.—CheeseburgerFace (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Maybe it is in the strictest technical sense, but I think "exploit" just isn't the right word to use (it implies vulnerability, which it isn't exactly, IMO), as how changing your username to my username via displayname isn't really an exploit. It's simply piping a link to a Special page (SPECIAL:USERLOGOUT), a page that's an action. The others are more malicious, but it's still a prank. That's all there is to it. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
When people think of security, many people think of finding zero-days and bugs to exploits. In reality, the most common breaches of security is Social engineeringWikipedia's W.svg, exploiting human trust and manipulating people. According to the other wiki, a vulnerabilityWikipedia's W.svg is exploiting a bug or flaw. The ability to have a non-session specific URL/redirect perform an action for all users is a design flaw and downright bad design.—CheeseburgerFace (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Single point checklist for when humor templates confuse you


Are the children overstimulated?

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
how do I "good post?" Gaul Dernitt (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Did you steal my golden signature color?

-ᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 22:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Sure did.—CheeseburgerFace (talk) 03:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
What's the idea behindᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 05:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Got lazy and used your template as a base.—CheeseburgerFace (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Do you guys have to use the exact same yellow for your signatures? It makes it slightly hard to differentiate the two of you in my head ;C Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
You also use the exact same faux talk message gag... Guys c'mon Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
MU~HA~HA~HA~HA~~~~~~~!CheeseburgerFace (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC) that a slightly darker gold I see? xD Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

[edit] You a big fan of wearing cowboy hats indoors?

Well, in any case, come on by! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Block War?

What's that about? Oh, and that message template was actually clever. I was pretty surprised to be logged out. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

RationalWiki:Blocking_policy#Joke_blocksCheeseburgerFace (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Ah. I see. Well, have a good night(well, it's night here in California, at least), sir! RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

[edit] did you write the deep web article?

hey so im lazy and dont know how to use wiki. im honestly surprised i got here bc im literally so confused and an idiot and also was overwhelmed by the manual thing that pops up when youre a new user. ok but did you write that article? i was reading it and all those little jokes and stuff in there made me laugh really fucking hard bc theyre so sarcastic and if you did write it i wanted to say thanks bc i was having a shit day. imma go read some of those articles linked on your user page now. thanks fam Breezeham (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Scanning through the fossil record it seems to have been written mostly by Cheeseburgerface and Deku-shrub. Christopher (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
You "don't know how to use wiki" yet your signed your post? (Going by the fact it doesn't have "--" before it you didn't even simply click on the sign button but knew where the tilde button was on your keyboard and that that was how you sign posts). Christopher (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
its called i read the thing at the bottom that says use four tildes to sign it. also thanks for finding that now i know how to do it :) Breezeham (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
also i just reread my comment and im cringing so hard why couldn't i form normal, non-run on sentences ?? yikes it wasnt even late at night too Breezeham (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I was sort of joking about that. (Allthough users do often make sockpuuppets I didn't think you were one). Christopher (talk) 21:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
lol i didnt mean to sound passive aggressive in that comment. wow i need to pull myself together its 6:30 and im like dying. also sockpuuppets doesnt exist?? Breezeham (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
It's fine, I swear we had an article about sockpuppets, a sockpuppet is a second account made by a user who already has one (on most wikis it means accounts created to avoid punishment etc but on rationalwiki it means any account made by someone who already has one to prevent impersonation etc). You said you liked the deep web article, click here to see some of our best articles. Christopher (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Personal tools