If home is where the heart is, then I live in my upper chest!!!

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

LQT archive from back when that sort of thing was hip.

This page is automatically archived by Pibot
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>


[edit] Bot account (sticky)

NoiseBot, for editing Edit Filters and not clogging up RC. NoiseBot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

That red button- what does it do? Should I press it? MĖSSIÅH ØF DØØM Weird attention whoreDolan.png 05:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
It blocks that account. Only press it if that bot goes awry or, in this case, if an edit filter goes haywire as a means of drawing my attention to an edit filter problem. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 06:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

[edit] "was just checking"

You can view deleted revisions from the same page you use for restoring them - just click on the datestamp, the revision's code will be displayed.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

I know, but it was easier to do it that way from my Android. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 19:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] RNS you lousy thug

I remember when I was a sysop here you had a softspot for the trolls, Erin used to always kiss your ass and I'll be you even knew who she is. I remember you made an account called MarcusC to stick up for Robert too. How about if I kiss your ass, will you pamper me too?

What did Erin look like nude? She was such an ass kisser to you I know damn good and well she sent you nudes. Was she hot? - redacted

"Trust me, you're gonna really want that cowbell."
Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Who is this sad wanker anyway? Marcus, or Dirk Steele? Clearly, somebody's off his meds again. PsyGremlinPraat! 01:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I've always wanted to use that that template that returns the username of the person viewing. If I could remember that template I would totally reply with "I suspect <username>". That would be sweet. Tielec01 (talk) 01:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
(ec) You mean the one that basically says Anonymous user is a complete tossbox? PsyGremlinPraat! 01:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Even though I know exactly what that code does, I'm still going to pretend to be offended by it. You monster! - Grant (talk) 01:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I think I know who it is, but won't divulge their identity in public in case I am wrong. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 01:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Am I blocked for being a Korean anti-Semite?

If so, it's a bit strange, considering that I'm a Swedish Judeophile. Now, you can't really be faulted for not knowing of my philo-Semitism, but the fact that I'm Swedish is pretty obvious considering the fact that I sign with my IP.

This community has so far managed to disappoint ever the dismal expectations the quality of its writing and intellectual rigour gave me. (talk) 12:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

They are retards who think taking on creationists makes them scientists. (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
It just frustrates me to see wiki contributors ostensibly dedicated to rationalism fail to even consider ideas that fall outside certain parochial Western dogmas that have absolutely nothing to do with science. I don't waste time on Conservapedia or Stormfront or other sites that are explicitly pro-idiocy, but I just had this naïve hope that I could appeal to rationality on a site with the word "rational" in it. I guess I'm a tad too literal-minded to handle the Internet. (talk) 13:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
As a general in a technical war here, it would be idiotic of me to tip my hand as to my strategy. However, rest assured that once my filter program is complete, you'll have a much harder time editing here. So far as your attempts above at appealing to rationality go, take them and shove them where the sun don't shine. You're not unfamiliar to me. You don't seek any sort of debate or discussion; rather, you just like listening to your own twisted voice. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, your blatant anti-rationalism is refreshing in its honesty. But are you seriously still trying to tell me that I am in fact an anti-Semitic Korean? Because yesterday was the first time I ever wrote anything on this site. And I'm Swedish. (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Either you're a liar or I don't have a clue what you're referring to. If you are new here, then why, exactly would you accuse me of blocking you for being a Korean anti-Semite? Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
FYI: There's this asshat in South Korea who keeps on making sock accounts. He has a huge hate-boner for Jews and other topics related to racism. Looks like that's where anon 213.113 got his info. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I was blocked with the motivation simply being "Mikemikev", which I assumed was the name of this Korean person. It's possible that the block was issued by someone else, but you were the one who shut down the discussion on "racial realism". In any case, the pointlessly hostile and anti-intellectual treatment I've been getting on this site speaks volumes about the integrity of its contributors. You're completely uninterested in objective facts and the best available research. Oh, and you're not some "general" in a "war". There is no Enemy, and you're not fighting on the side of Good and Justice. (talk) 11:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
In any case, the block is obviously gone now, so I'm merely trying to figure out why it was issued in the first place. (talk) 11:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
The talkpage being locked had nothing to do with you personally and had to do with me testing some things to get rid of a troll. I apologize if you were an unfortunate casualty of that, and I did see there were false positives, whis is why I ceased doing it. Everything from there on out was a total misunderstanding, on my part, of what you were talking about, compounded by the fact that I was not near my PC during the start of it, couldn't easily access anything to double check some things, and thought you were originally referring to an Abuse Filter that went after only known trolling IPs. I apologize, again, for y he misunderstanding, but you can't blame me for being confused by a bunch of technical factors. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

"As a general in a technical war here, it would be idiotic of me to tip my hand as to my strategy. However, rest assured that once my filter program is complete, you'll have a much harder time editing here. So far as your attempts above at appealing to rationality go, take them and shove them where the sun don't shine. You're not unfamiliar to me. You don't seek any sort of debate or discussion; rather, you just like listening to your own twisted voice."

Well firstly, I'm not the Swedish IP. Not everyone that ridicules your far-left pseudoscientific PC extremism under the hypocritical banner of self proclaimed "rationalism" is me. Second, I absolutely am here to discuss. You lot are the ones removing my comments and blocking me, while again hypocritically accusing me of avoiding debate. The reality, as you know, is that you can't debate me. You can't stand up to actual science. And sadly hitting the easy target of creationism doesn't qualify you for that, you dime store Aristotle. You people are guilty of exactly what you claim to oppose. What crass dishonesty. And as for being a "general" in a "war", Jesus H. Christ. Could you be any more delusional? (talk) 06:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Absolute bullshit. We've been "debating" you here for years, but after so many years of you trolling our pages and not listening to anything but your own voice, we are tired of you. Hell, even Metapedia got tired of you and your dick-waving. You don't seek to debate anybody, you seek to listen to your own delusional voice at best and troll us (and Metapedia, and Wikipedia) at worst. Your time here, meine fruend (just like at Metapedia and Wikipedia) is up. You clearly have no interest in intelligent dialogue or listening to any point of view that isn't your own. That's fine, but don't expect us to want to give a damn. Now, please do me a favor and remove your Nazi self from my talkpage. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Test driving

Vroom vroom! Noisemobile (talk) 01:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

[edit] "Tedious Crackpot Spam"

What does that mean when you use it to remove stuff? It's pretty vague.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 08:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

In the context in which it was used against you, it means "I'm a disgrace to this Wiki because I'd rather not try to debate you." Thus, it's vague because it's used in a manner which is not constructive to this Wiki's stated mission. As a result, I went ahead and undid much of what had been done to your edits, especially since I sought to have the debate you wanted. I apologize on behalf of the Wiki for the abuses that were lobbed at you. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
"Tedious Crackpot Spam" would be a legitimate point to be made about gish gallops and purely copy-pasted arguments. While I think you're right to replace his edits, I would warn ReptoidKiller that it does take effort to research these theories and so it would be impolite to post too many at once. We will answer questions, but we ask that you do not abuse this. --TiaC (talk) 08:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC) (Edited)
I would edit that just a little and say that you should be careful not to start numerous arguments on numerous topics at once. While people like me are more than tolerant of such things, there is always the risk of ruffling feathers. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
You're quite right, fixed. It bears mentioning that people will be more willing to answer questions if you present your questions as an honest desire to learn. I think your odd formatting may have hurt this and caused editors to assume that you were merely copy-pasting arguments you weren't invested in. --TiaC (talk) 09:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools