There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:David Gerard"
David Gerard (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Earthland (Talk) to last version by David Gerard) |
(It's still my text and others are supposed to keep away from it. Really.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== No == | == No == | ||
− | + | You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | |
:Actually Earthland is right. -- [[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]] / [[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | :Actually Earthland is right. -- [[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]] / [[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Just something I need to say == | == Just something I need to say == | ||
− | + | At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth"). | |
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you. | However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average. | There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average. | ||
− | --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | + | --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC) |
:[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | :[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | ::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:35, 5 June 2010
No
You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --Earthland (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Just something I need to say
At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive after you had just deleted (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.
--Earthland (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Wëäŝëïöïď
Methinks it is a Weasel 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on LessWrong, since we're too dumb for him - David Gerard (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)