User talk:David Gerard
From RationalWiki
|
[edit] That image macro
I'm interested in your views on the "rationalist tears" image's placement, being discussed here. Alec Sanderson (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Twitter
Don't you control @RationalWiki? I think that, since there was already a thing about female Thor, a mention of @rafaalbuquerque could be a good idea. He and @cameronMstewart got a lot of vile thrown at them by "GG" types recently because Albuquerque pulled his own variant cover of his own volition (there's a discussion in the saloon about this). Narky Sawtooth
(Nyar~) 23:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- I mean, if you haven't already. Narky Sawtooth
(Nyar~) 23:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think I just noted in passing that looking at the sales, those gosh darn SJWs were ruining everything by saving the comics industry - David Gerard (talk) 07:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, another thing: Quite a few of my tweets don't show up anywhere, and it seems to be part of an algorithm thingymabop that doesn't show relatively new users. Would following me (@NarkySawtooth) with the RW account help my tweets to show up? I mean, if I'm follow-worthy. I don't really know what people here or anywhere think of me. Narky Sawtooth
(Nyar~) 21:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, another thing: Quite a few of my tweets don't show up anywhere, and it seems to be part of an algorithm thingymabop that doesn't show relatively new users. Would following me (@NarkySawtooth) with the RW account help my tweets to show up? I mean, if I'm follow-worthy. I don't really know what people here or anywhere think of me. Narky Sawtooth
- #convictkent made me LOL, so have your retweet ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Quack Miranda Warning
I didn't find that article when looking for the one I created. I think I should probably just merge anything useful and redirect it. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 16:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, it did occur to me that essentially, the phrase is a quack Miranda warning and a merge might be in order. The particular phrase and its history is pretty interesting and relevant though - David Gerard (talk) 16:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)