Difference between revisions of "User talk:David Gerard"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Earthland (Talk) to last version by David Gerard)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== No ==
 
== No ==
  
You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
<small><small><small><small><small>You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
:Actually Earthland is right. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:Actually Earthland is right. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== Just something I need to say ==
 
== Just something I need to say ==
  
At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").
+
<small><small><small><small><small>At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").
  
 
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.
 
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.
Line 12: Line 12:
 
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.  
 
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.  
  
--[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
--[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
:[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:::''"He's only just heard that thinking exists"'' your words speak of great maturity indeed. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
:::<small><small><small><small><small>''"He's only just heard that thinking exists"'' your words speak of great maturity indeed. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
::::You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
== New section ==
 
 
(Just thought that you'll notice)
 
 
:::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEarthland&diff=519997&oldid=519995 Toast says it]. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 19:54, 5 June 2010

No

You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --Earthland (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Actually Earthland is right. -- Nx / talk 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Just something I need to say

At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").

However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive after you had just deleted (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.

There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.

--Earthland (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Wtf.gif WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on LessWrong, since we're too dumb for him - David Gerard (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
"He's only just heard that thinking exists" your words speak of great maturity indeed. --Earthland (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - David Gerard (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)