Forum talk:The Elliott Argument

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Here is where we will discuss how absolutely absurd this argument is. Please make sure you use citations and references for all refutation. Click on "add section" to start a new subject on this talk page! OptiPest (talk) 00:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Amusing, as special creation by a deity really requires both of these. Either the deity performs creatio ex nihilo, which is said to be illogical or creatio ex materia, which is also said to be illogical. Either way, how you get from this sort of thing to any specific religious dogma is still a puzzle. Scarlet A.pngnarchistModerator 00:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
What I don't understand is why is anyone paying attention to this 13 year old and his PRATT bullshit. "If you are in possession of this revolutionary secret of science, why not prove it and be hailed as the new Newton?
Of course, we know the answer. You can't do it. You are a fake." -- Nx / talk 07:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Buddy you need to stop giving this clown attention. When a person is this far gone with this many delusions and with that many problems, you leave them alone to their corner to talk to themselves. The world is in total chaos because you give an idiot attention, and we're all suffering because of it. Please stop with this article and let it die. Let Chad die. Let him fade away and nobody ever remember him. — Unsigned, by: 76.73.41.174 / talk / contribs 08:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

We'd put him on the special step, but Dirk Steele's still using it. SophieWilder 10:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
He is pathetic and no amount of attention I give him will make him famous except for the fact he is an idiot that cannot measure up to William Lane Craig, Ken Ham or Eric Hovind! He will snap at some point and the bully needs to be bullied to make a point that he is nothing and always will be. This is supposed to be place to:
1. Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement.
2. Documenting the full range of crank ideas.
3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
So why aren't people doing this instead of telling me to leave the fuckwit alone? Show him where he fails and let everyone have fun with it at his expense! OptiPest (talk) 16:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
We are not your personal army. I fight only for my Birthland.--MonarchofascistBulgarian M36 Helmet side view.jpgС нами Бог! 17:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Correct, but I would assume you would have your own thoughts on this topic! If not, that is fine, but I am sure you have individuals similar to this one in your birthland. OptiPest (talk) 17:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Lol....You piemcs seriously make me laugh...bwhahaha...you know how funny it is to me that all of you worry so much about me and censoring my arguments...i absolutely love it more than you will ever know!!! But, let me know when any of you would like to stop yapping and face me in a live debate!! Thats what Im really interested in. Until you accept, i will remain undefeated and you will be a coward...and after you accept, i will remain undefeated an you will be put in the zoo with all the evidence of losing to me....God Bless...The EA is irrefutable...all of you know it...thanks for playing...2 years, no loses! THE CHAMP IS HERE— Unsigned, by: Theatheistkilla / talk / contribs

The Fuckwit Atheist Killa[edit]

As this willfully retarded individual has stated, this argument is all over the internet on websites, blogs, YouTube videos & FB pages and groups. The only thing he does not realize is that it is only in the Atheist community and not one sing Theist will give him the time of day! You can Google the Elliott Argument and find there is nothing but negative commentary.

While he claims his argument is irrefutable, he has not won one debate with anybody and claims he owns victory whenever someone declines to debate him. His challenges are childish and immature and fail miserably. He has made multiple videos claiming to own people, only to be caught with his pants down when you actually read what was debated. He asks Atheists to answer questions on his FB page, but immediately deletes and bans them for rule violation. His page is nothing more than him talking to himself.

By observation, this individual is a nobody, but needs to be put down like a rabid dog. OptiPest (talk) 17:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

HAHAHA IMA NOBODY? BETTER TYPE IN MY REAL NAME IN THE INTERNET AND SEE WHO I REALLY AM...YOU ARE THE NOBODY SIR LOL...AND I HAVE HAD OVER 100 DEBATES..NEVER LOST A SINGLE ONE..THATS WHY YOU ARE SCARED OF ME, DELETE MY COMMENTS, RUN AWAY, AND MAKE EXCUSES...YOU SIR ARE JOKE, AND I SINCERELY LOVE THE FACT THAT YOU SPEND EVERY MOMENT OF YOUR LIFE EDITING, CENSORING, AND WORRYING ABOUT MY COMMENTS, TEXT AND ARGUMENTS...ITS SIMPLY ANOTHER VICTORY...SO THANK YOU..OH YEA AND YOUR OWNAGE VIDEO IS NOW ON YOUTUBE AND FB WHERE WITH ALL THE EVIDENCE AND SCREEN SHOTS OF YOU BOWING TO THE AK....NOW RUN ALONG PUSSY AND GO FIGURE OUT A NEW WAY TO WORRY ABOUT ME LOL....

− and if you think i should be put down how bout you be the one to do it pussy and stop talking..face me one on one you coward!! oh ya you wont because ur a pathetic clown!!! lol....the reason my argument is not used by any major apologists yet is because its too new dipshit lol

http://youtu.be/Z5OWorhXUtc — Unsigned, by: Theatheistkilla / talk / contribs

This is why we can't have any good things in this life! I actually feel sorry for the pathetic attempt to provoke people. The only coward is the one who asserts themselves as authoritarian in a field he has no experience in. Caps lock is for people who don't have a lick of sense and want to show how little their dick is. I hope someday you will grow up and hope you never have kids, as you would surely turn them into crap such as yourself! OptiPest (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Reason 295 that this world is in chaos. You've given your attention to a moron with an acorn for a brain. And you can't even see that you're doing the world damage by letting him think he's winning. I don't understand humanity, I truly don't. All you have done is inflated his egocentric personality and added to his spotlight. There's a reason he has delusions of grandiose, it's because people bother with him. Imagine how much better the world would be if we let him shout to the skies and paid no attention whatsoever to him. That's the true way to fuck with him. Shame that you created this article. Absolute shame. — Unsigned, by: 76.73.41.174 / talk / contribs
Worry about yourself and not what is going on here. You don't want to have anything to do with this, yet you are constantly vandalizing the essay to get rid of something you don't want to see. Go about your business and leave this alone. OptiPest (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Done with the Fuckwit![edit]

I have removed the essay and am asking that a Sysop remove the essay completely! I have proven my point and no one will ever accept the Elliott Argument as anything more than the remblings of a mad YEC. If you wish to keep it, copy it or change it for your own purposes! I am done! OptiPest (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Since you and he are equally annoying, I'll be glad to see the back of you, him and this whole juvenile pissfest. SophieWilder 21:28, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
How have I been annoying any more than the rest of the users on here? I at least dropped the issue, he won't. He has also been blocked multiple times for his bull shit. I have done nothing but follow the guidelines set forth by this site! OptiPest (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Did someone say "battleground mentality" somewhere? It has not been entertaining to watch you and AK slapping away at each other. Better to have never brought that trollbait argument here in the first place. Never mind. I, for one, think you did the right thing in asking to have it removed. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, I made a mistake and owned up to it. I pledge to never bring anything like that back into this site! It was a headache and I apologize to all of you for having to put up with it. I would suggest getting rid of the AK if you don't want to have any more problems. I surely won't be causing you any, at least not any more! I think I pointed out his Authoritarianism, Fundamentalism and Crank idea pretty well. Now it is done and over with. Sorry for the trouble! OptiPest (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2012 (UTC)