RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $6000Goal: $6000
Information icon.svg The 2018 moderator election has started! We are electing 6 moderators and 2 alternatives to serve in 2019. Nominate users here and read their campaign slogans here!

Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

  • you feel that Ryulong is such a bad dude, then ban Ryulong for several months. Or vandal bin him. Or perma-ban him like Tisane. If Ryulong is so wrong,
    240 KB (33,313 words) - 18:02, 20 November 2015
  • options for dealing with Ryu seem to be: Ban Ryulong Topic ban Ryulong Create a specific set of rules for Ryulong including "No undo-ing without any discussion"
    223 KB (29,274 words) - 22:22, 19 August 2016
  • discussion on the Chicken Coop. As such, I reopped Exiled and reopped Ryulong. Ryulong has brought this up on numerous pages and mentioned a previous Chicken
    69 KB (9,895 words) - 18:01, 20 November 2015
  • targeting Ryulong like this before, in the past. The thing that infuriates me here, was that it was my edit he was reverting, but his focus was on Ryulong. Like
    42 KB (6,058 words) - 15:16, 8 December 2015
  • garbage that "Ryulong is just as bad as the windmills he's tilting against" doesn't help for shit. Take your concern trolling elsewhere.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:22
    192 KB (27,109 words) - 08:10, 4 April 2016
  • or fuzzy cat potato?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC) We don't block people for being cocks. Be thankful for that Ryulong; extend other people
    181 KB (26,630 words) - 18:01, 20 November 2015
  • like a Bad Idea®.—Ryulong (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC) Given that nearly every coop in the last 12 months has involved Ryulong in one form another
    98 KB (13,623 words) - 21:45, 1 January 2016
  • February 2015 (UTC) Tielec01 I never blocked him.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Apologies Ryulong you are correct it was DG who blocked him. It
    41 KB (5,747 words) - 18:49, 7 May 2016
  • says "buddyloid" so Ryulong must have it that way, even though the rest of the english-speaking world disagrees. My favorite Ryulong mistranslation is the
    233 KB (34,015 words) - 08:19, 4 April 2016
  • left page. You helped to drive off Carpetsmoker and were a defender of Ryulong. So tell me again how you have had no problems.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 15:50
    20 KB (2,547 words) - 01:17, 3 June 2016
  • having a specific viewpoint. Basically, the above is about the legality of Ryulong-type behaviour over extended periods of time, impeding the work of numerous
    180 KB (22,198 words) - 07:32, 29 June 2016
  • to haphazardly enact — in order to intimidate and harass — like Mona or Ryulong would. The fact that you combined the desysopping with vandal binning the
    148 KB (18,408 words) - 18:04, 22 October 2016
  • being banned. Community. "Sanction." Is. A. Joke. Someone needs to contact Ryulong and tell him to come on back, just with a different name. That I spent even
    86 KB (12,978 words) - 22:07, 17 April 2016
  • be hypocritical of me to not extend her the same good faith I extended Ryulong in very similar circumstances. She is stressed out and exhausted for very
    121 KB (18,257 words) - 02:09, 20 June 2016
  • 2016 (UTC) Your inexplicable enabling of the Champion Internet Fucktard, Ryulong, has robbed you of all credibility here, DG. Now you seek to repeat the
    146 KB (19,604 words) - 22:40, 17 April 2016