Talk:Nudity

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sex.svg

This Sexuality related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately.

This article is of LOW importance to the wiki.

See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Ok, who do you know that looks pink and fuzzy like that nude, they are secret Plushie fetishists. And why is the little girl handling THAT ! STOP IT ! Hamster (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we should move the link to the furry fandom article, as an example of human fursuits. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I was not expecting that to be a family photo, I feel very dirty right now... if there is even 1 photo like that that does not contain children could that please be used instead? — Unsigned, by: Samstr / talk / contribs

[edit] Sexuality category?

Maybe this is a little (or very) nitpicky, but does this really belong in the sexuality section? That seems to imply that clothes-free states are inherently sexual. Fallacy (talk) 22:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't know. It's all to do with the context of how it applies to RW. It seems to have two angles; 1) religious conservatives are against it, therefore are nuts. 2) New Agers are for it, and therefore nuts. Scarlet A.pngmoral 22:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support