Category talk:Navigation templates suck!!!!!

But... but... think of the SEO!--Krej^talk 19:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

The randomised article links that are built into pretty much all of them also make "what links here" on any given article into an unhelpful list of pages in the same category rather than an actual list of pages linking to that one. This is seriously bad for article deletion process. Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 00:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I just love love side templates. We have them for every possible category, instead of only for those categories which matter most to this website. Hey look, a side-template for things about the Roman Empire. We also have one for politics, US politics, and UK politics just in case "politics" didn't cover it enough. We also have one for podcasts because, you know, we have so damn many articles about podcasts that make them worthy of a template. And that's before we factor in all the stub articles we added this into just so it wouldn't look as, well, stubby. What the hell, why build the article at all when we can just add a side-template to distract you from the sentence or two written about some podcaster nobody cares about anyways, right? Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)