Conservapedia talk:Bias in Conservapedia (May 2007)
Homophobia[edit]
Please note, I have included a direct external cite to
- Homophobia Online: The Westboro Baptist Church, Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07. [1]
This is a large concession, because although ADL's definition of homophobia probably is outdated as the CP article has documented, this covers the reservations many editors had on that page. This is a major concession, and a recognition of the ADL as a reputable and valid source. RobS 17:50, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- I suspect Andrew doesn't see his own bias for the same reason fish don't see water. :( --Gulik 23:04, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- You mean that he swims in his own pee? human
15:08, 25 November 2007 (EST)
- You mean that he swims in his own pee? human
Wicca[edit]
Conservapedia's article on Wicca fails to mention the centuries of persecution they endured at the hands of Christians. Not a word. With some irony, I quote:
"Not to be sarcastic but I found this article strangely devoid of bias. I find that nice.--Snotbowst 18:01, 28 February 2008 (EST)"
If Wikipedia leaving stuff out is bias, Conservapedia leaving stuff out almost certainly is.
Ngo Dinh Diem[edit]
Conservapedia's page on Ngo Dinh Diem is propaganda! There left out anything to do with his prosecution of Buddhist. Conservapedia's page said he was a Dinh Diem was a devout Catholic throughout his life. leaving out his respect toward Hitler. Ghy213 (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)