Conservapedia talk:Parthian shot/RodWeathers

That was just mean. I love it. And I wish I could be there to hear the new SDG go into a spasm of paranoia about it. --Gulik 19:46, 14 February 2009 (EST)

We just have to get TK on our side now. . . --"CUR^talk 19:47, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Given how many trusted editors turned out to be one of us, what makes you think TK isn't on our side? - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 19:55, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Oh wait, isn't he myself? --"CUR^talk 19:56, 14 February 2009 (EST)

You = selfcentred much? User:Mei 20:00, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Do I have to connect the dots for you CUR? TK=Ames. Isn't it obvious? - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 20:01, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Oh, so who am I? Ken

? --"CUR^talk 20:02, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Oh! I almost forgot! I am teh assfly! --"CUR^talk 20:02, 14 February 2009 (EST)

NO you are extremely obvious and terrible troll/parodist who gets blocked in seconds. - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 20:03, 14 February 2009 (EST)

Only because I don't try to hide it! But I am not a troll! Vandal, maybe. But not a troll. --"CUR^talk 20:05, 14 February 2009 (EST)

I hope that when I get back on CP on the 19th, I am not banned for having been gone a week... >_> ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ I saw a queen beside here...

May I just say that I just had happened to come across this page at random and as I started reading turned on some music I was listening to earlier, and the music was so epic and as I read the essay with the music in the background it was just a really amazing experience. (The song I was listening to is titled "How The World Fell Under Darkness" in case you wanted to know) 66.112.240.210 04:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

You have exposed RationWiki's position as intellectually bankrupt.

Moved to Debate:RationWiki's position is intellectually bankrupt