Debate talk:Block Earthland permanently?

Points of order

If an editor of RW has transgressed, the "correct" order of remedial efforts should, it seems to me, follow this process:

1. Potential promotion. It is assumed that anyone here long enough to piss someone off has been sysopped. This has to be done at RW:Admin abuse, and done properly.

2. Vandal binning discussion to decide if they are truly horribly disruptive.

3. Discussing punitive blocks. While the VB slows down most troublemakers, reasonable blocks for high crimes and misdemeanors against the wiki can be discussed.

This is the logical series of escalating sanctions, it seems to me, and at every step alleged transgressions should be thoroughly documented, not merely asserted. ħuman 01:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I am happy that we at least have discussions on perma-banning rather than just offing people we disagree with. I agree with Human's above proposal wholeheartedly--Thanatos (talk) 02:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

yup Hamster (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)