|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Draft talk:Phlogiston
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Phlogiston is a part of science as much as alchemy is. Just sayin' Šţěŗĭļė ferret fancier 02:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is more of a protoscience than a pseudoscience. - π 02:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has it in the category Obsolete scientific theories, maybe we should get ourselves one? - π 02:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Is it an obselete scientific theory? I suppose it does incorporate a large number of observations and has hypothesis that confirm it. Hmmm... never thought about it that way.... Šţěŗĭļė ferret fancier 02:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has it in the category Obsolete scientific theories, maybe we should get ourselves one? - π 02:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/1qcftq/is_dark_matter_real_or_is_it_the_modern/
Dark matter is no phlogistion. The term you are looking for is dark energy--Costea (talk) 11:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Formatting[edit]
This page also needs formatting 2604:A880:400:D0:0:0:1E7D:E001 (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)