There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Draft talk:Terf Wars
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I believe it'd be better to merge that with JK Rowling's article or the TERF article. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- It’s long enough to warrant its own article if it does get finished, side-by-side refutations of obscure bullshit is a long RationalWiki tradition. The BoN said they might finish it, if they don’t it should just be deleted. Christopher (talk) 23:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)