There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
In the Bible Genesis 2:20 God presents all the animals to Adam for naming. Adam also is asked which of the animals he finds suitable as a helpmeet. He declines any of them so God proceeds to remove his rib and make Eve. Adam was never asked to approve Eve.
What religious implications would have resulted from Adam selecting an animal ?
God: "which one looks fair to your eyes my Son ?"
Adam:" The stoat looks like fun , but that little bear is just so warm and cuddly looking, she has such nimble paws and is quite strong. She could be a good buddy and help a lot with the fruit gathering. "
God: eerrgghhh WTF ! a BEAR !!! erkkk ...
With no Eve , there would be no temptation , no Fall of man , no inate sin, no flood etc .
There would just be an immortal Adam , God and the cuddly bear in the Garden of Eden.
|"?"||"User welcomes discussion"|