| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
File talk:Icon doomsday.svg
disappointing. I'd have preferred a mushroom cloud or a hobo wearing a sign--"Shut up, Brx." 20:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- How about this? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes! But I don't think we could stylize it properly to fit in with the other icons.--"Shut up, Brx." 20:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- No need to stylise, just use it.
bomination 01:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- No need to stylise, just use it.
- Yes! But I don't think we could stylize it properly to fit in with the other icons.--"Shut up, Brx." 20:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
It's a clock, and a clock doesn't say "doomsday." While I don't necessarily like all the minimalist logos (the denialism logo is particularly hard to discern), if we're going to be consistent, then a simple mushroom cloud logo will do.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Well, it's a reference to the Doomsday Clock, if that helps. I'm actually coming around to thinking not so much a WIGO as a WIGO archive specifically of 2012 related posts and news items. So you don't need the kitschy icons for that.
sshole 03:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I know. But the fact that you felt the need to explain what it is bespeaks its failure as a logo.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I know. But the fact that you felt the need to explain what it is bespeaks its failure as a logo.