2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Forum:Conservapedia's D&D article

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

As a first time poster I'd like to say I wandered in here while searching for articles on Jack Chick and scientology to see if the old nut had ever attacked the Co$, and read the D&D article, then followed the link to conservapedia's article on D&D.

I must say it was more fair and balanced than I'd expected, and in fact seemed to state that in 30 years there had been no proven acts of satanism or the occult linked to D&D.

It did air a lot of the extremists viewpoints, but made it clear these were opinions and not facts.

Wow, conservapedia did a fair article? maybe that whole 2012 thing has some validity to it after all...

a lot of their stuff is fair. quite a bit of their fair stuff was copied by Rjensen from Citizendium, where he wrote them. The rest was hijacked by either moderate conservatives or liberals, who, in spite of their valiant efforts, are (probably) now all banned.--brxbrx-brxbrx 03:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)