Fun:It's hot

I mean, it's like 32 degrees centigrade in my apartment. Goddam third-floor walkups. I hate summer.

I hate summer too! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 16:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

You guys are aware we have the forums for this sort of thing, right? :-) --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:10, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Damn you and your templating! Can't you see this is the most important page on RW now? THIS THING IS BIGGER THAN US!

<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 16:20, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Right over there in the sidebar to the left. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:22, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Forums is too dul. I has spoken.

Besides, the forums are not sufficiently delineated from the talk pages here! We should have one place for talking and do all our talking in that place! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 16:25, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I must protest! Or forums are not "dul". They are the bestest forums on the Internets! --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:26, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Those two things are not mutually exclusive :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 16:30, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

"Dull" is not exactly a quality I associate with "a good forum", although going by the ontologival argument, I guess the perfect forum could choose to be infintely dull and still remain perfect, should it desire to do so. I hope our forums are above such shenanigans, though. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:43, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

All forums is dul. Ours is leastbad. Refute that, you Danish extremist! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 16:46, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Ok, you win. Furthermore, I advise you not to miss the experience of these exceptional, least-dull forums, but going there and signing up TODAY! RIGHT NOW, in fact! Only available while stocks last! --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 16:54, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I have sined up, but I bet it's really dul. Will you cosine? (Humour) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 17:09, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I'd rather cotangent, if it's ok with you. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 17:16, 7 June 2008 (EDT) Disclaimer: I don't actually understand what I just wrote, nor maths as such. But I hope it was funny.

I don't think there's such as thing as cotangent. Sorry :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 17:21, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I'm pretty sure there is, it's on wiki and everything. I understand it's "the multiplicative inverse of tan(A), i.e. the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the length of the opposite side". Or rather, I don't actually understand that, but that's what it says. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 17:53, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I hate math :(

...

Can I borrow a copy of that "disease on humanity" userbox you made? :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 18:03, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Sure - just borrow whatever you want, that's what I do. --AKjeldsen^{Potential fundamentalist!} 18:17, 7 June 2008 (EDT)