There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun:It's hot
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I mean, it's like 32 degrees centigrade in my apartment. Goddam third-floor walkups. I hate summer.
- I hate summer too! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- You guys are aware we have the forums for this sort of thing, right? :-) --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:10, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Damn you and your templating! Can't you see this is the most important page on RW now? THIS THING IS BIGGER THAN US!
- <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:20, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Right over there in the sidebar to the left. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:22, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Forums is too dul. I has spoken.
- Besides, the forums are not sufficiently delineated from the talk pages here! We should have one place for talking and do all our talking in that place! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:25, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I must protest! Or forums are not "dul". They are the bestest forums on the Internets! --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:26, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Those two things are not mutually exclusive :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:30, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- "Dull" is not exactly a quality I associate with "a good forum", although going by the ontologival argument, I guess the perfect forum could choose to be infintely dull and still remain perfect, should it desire to do so. I hope our forums are above such shenanigans, though. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:43, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- All forums is dul. Ours is leastbad. Refute that, you Danish extremist! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:46, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Ok, you win. Furthermore, I advise you not to miss the experience of these exceptional, least-dull forums, but going there and signing up TODAY! RIGHT NOW, in fact! Only available while stocks last! --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:54, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I have sined up, but I bet it's really dul. Will you cosine? (Humour) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 17:09, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'd rather cotangent, if it's ok with you. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:16, 7 June 2008 (EDT) Disclaimer: I don't actually understand what I just wrote, nor maths as such. But I hope it was funny.
- I don't think there's such as thing as cotangent. Sorry :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 17:21, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'm pretty sure there is, it's on wiki and everything. I understand it's "the multiplicative inverse of tan(A), i.e. the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the length of the opposite side". Or rather, I don't actually understand that, but that's what it says. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:53, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I hate math :(
- ...
- Can I borrow a copy of that "disease on humanity" userbox you made? :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 18:03, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Sure - just borrow whatever you want, that's what I do. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:17, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'm pretty sure there is, it's on wiki and everything. I understand it's "the multiplicative inverse of tan(A), i.e. the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the length of the opposite side". Or rather, I don't actually understand that, but that's what it says. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:53, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I don't think there's such as thing as cotangent. Sorry :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 17:21, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'd rather cotangent, if it's ok with you. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:16, 7 June 2008 (EDT) Disclaimer: I don't actually understand what I just wrote, nor maths as such. But I hope it was funny.
- I have sined up, but I bet it's really dul. Will you cosine? (Humour) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 17:09, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Ok, you win. Furthermore, I advise you not to miss the experience of these exceptional, least-dull forums, but going there and signing up TODAY! RIGHT NOW, in fact! Only available while stocks last! --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:54, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- All forums is dul. Ours is leastbad. Refute that, you Danish extremist! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:46, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- "Dull" is not exactly a quality I associate with "a good forum", although going by the ontologival argument, I guess the perfect forum could choose to be infintely dull and still remain perfect, should it desire to do so. I hope our forums are above such shenanigans, though. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:43, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Those two things are not mutually exclusive :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Quite possibly a fruitcake 16:30, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- I must protest! Or forums are not "dul". They are the bestest forums on the Internets! --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:26, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- Right over there in the sidebar to the left. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:22, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
- You guys are aware we have the forums for this sort of thing, right? :-) --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 16:10, 7 June 2008 (EDT)