Dear Anonymous User, a certain lady/gentleman at a certain atheist website starting with an R,
RE: Your previous comment which I ignored due to the utter weakness of the atheist position and strength of the Christian position
1. You and your co-obese atheists at a rather liberal website starting with an R have such flabby midsections that you are mentally incapable of find a single factual error in Conservapedia's articles that focus on atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, all of which largely consist of my edits. Taking into consideration the obvious fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are actually established facts, it wasn't really challenging for us to think up some articles that thoroughly attempt to offer counterexamples to these worldviews.
2. I soundly crushed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather unsurprisingly angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Going from there, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most clearly not claiming that it is due to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with Anonymous User and their fellow probably-obese atheists from a certain website starting with an R, it is just that atheism is such a baseless position with a glass jaw and a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.
3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in regards to my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.
4. Encyclopedias are usually supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to get aggravated at Conservapedia and find imperfections in it, but I really don't think that you can find a single inaccuracy in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.
5. I know that it makes you cry
to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to troll/harass me, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior PZ Meyers, in that you also look largely unattractive, also believe that women and men should be treated equal (!), and are also very large around the waist!
In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!
However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):
- In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
- You are to pay an exact total of $25,000.00 USD, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
- The debate will be written, and will be 30 hours long (which can be broken up over a 100 month period).
6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you live an incredibly short life, and spend the rest of eternity rotting in Hell, where your big, round body has always rightfully belonged!
DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b
Sincerely,
Newton
|
|