Fun:Ken Debate Challenge Generator

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest and is no longer the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia (and religious fundamentalism to an extent) was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of pseudoscientific claims, authoritarianism, and deceit.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the Best of RationalWiki.

[edit]

A generator that creates random Conservative debate challenges. It is inspired by actual debate challenges by Kendoll himself (although some of them near the end were added by us). Click here for a new challenge!

Debate Challenge[edit]

Dear Anonymous User at a rather liberal website,

RE: Your previous comment which I refuse to take seriously

1. You and your fellow obese Dawkins-worshippers at a rather atheistic website full of liberal claptrap that starts with an R are too obese and mentally challenged to find a single factual error in Conservapedia's articles that focus on atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which were all largely my contributions. In regards to the simple fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews actually hold any water whatsoever, it wasn't really challenging for us to come up with some articles that expertly attempt to disprove these worldviews.

2. I bravely thrashed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather obviously angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Therefore, it is only fitting that your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most apparently not claiming that it is pertaining to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you rather obese folks from a certain website starting with an R, it is just that atheism is such a baseless position - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in terms of my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias are often supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to get infuriated like a baby at Conservapedia and find cracks in it, but I really don't think that you can find any credible evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it makes you cry to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to troll/harass me, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior David Silverman, in that you also love attacking and insulting Christians in public, and more importantly, you also probably enjoy raping and harassing women (in regards to that, the Leftists were right for once)!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $45,000.00 USD, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 20 hours long (which can be broken up over a 90 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you live an incredibly short life, and spend the rest of eternity rotting in Hell, where your big, round body has always rightfully belonged!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b

Sincerely,

Conservative

[edit] [purge] Documentation

Usage[edit]

  • Do you ever wish you could get an idiotic and childlike debate offer from Ken? Try using this template: {{Ken Debate}}
  • If you'd like Ken to address a particular obese, mentally-challenged atheist gentleman: {{ken debate|gent=Dear <span class="myName">Anonymous User</span>}}.

See also[edit]