Dear Anonymous User, who purports to be "rational",
RE: Your previous comment which I ignored due to the utter weakness of the atheist position and strength of the Christian position
1. You and the other rather mentally-disabled members of your rather liberal website that falsely purports to be "rational" have such flabby midsections that you are mentally incapable of find even one single piece of evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in Conservapedia's articles pertaining to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, all of which were largely written by me. Since there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are scientific fact, it wasn't notably challenging for us to produce some articles that carefully attempt to offer arguments that pertain to these worldviews.
2. I expertly crushed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather predictably angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Accordingly, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am certainly not claiming that it is regarding my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with Anonymous User and their fellow probably-obese atheists, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly weak position with a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.
3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve regarding my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.
4. Encyclopedias normally involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to get aggravated like a baby at Conservapedia and find faults in it, but I really don't think that you can find even one inaccuracy in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.
5. I know that it makes you cry
to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to announce their intentions to destroy America, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior PZ Meyers, in that you also look largely unattractive, also believe that women and men should be treated equal (!), and are also very large around the waist!
In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!
However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):
- In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
- You are to pay an exact total of $45,000.00 USD, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
- The debate will be written, and will be 20 hours long (which can be broken up over a 120 month period).
6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you live an incredibly short life, and spend the rest of eternity rotting in Hell, where your big, round body has always rightfully belonged!
DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b
Sincerely,
Conservative
|
|