Fun:Ken Debate Challenge Generator

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


A generator that creates random Conservative debate challenges. Is inspired by actual debate challenges by Kendoll himself (although some of them near the end were added by us). Click here for a new challenge!

Debate Challenge[edit]

Dear Anonymous User, a certain lady/gentleman at a certain atheist website starting with an R,

RE: Your previous comment which I refuse to take seriously

1. You and the other members of your rather arrogant atheist website which falsely purports to be "rational" have an ideology (atheism) that is so weak that you cannot find any credible evidence that there are any factual errors in Conservapedia's articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which were all mainly written by me. Due to the fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are scientific fact, it wasn't really challenging for us to think up some articles that expertly attempt to offer counterexamples in regards to these worldviews.

2. I bravely thrashed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather understandably angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Pertaining to this, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am definitely not claiming that it is in regards to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you rather obese folks from a rather liberal website, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly baseless position - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve pertaining to my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias hopefully involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to yell in anger like a baby at Conservapedia and find gaps in it, but I really don't think that you can find any credible evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it angers to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to troll/harass me, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior David Silverman, in that you also love attacking and insulting Christians in public, and more importantly, you also probably enjoy raping and harassing women (in regards to that, the Leftists were right for once)!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $50,000.000 USD, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 30 hours long (which can be broken up over a 100 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I wish that your mother had just aborted you, you ugly, disgusting pig!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b


KD Buffalo

[edit] [purge] Documentation


  • If you'd like Ken to address a particular obese, mentally-challenged atheist gentleman: {{ken debate|gent=Dear <span class="myName">Anonymous User</span>}}.

See also[edit]