There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
For 2600:8800:8809:1C00:EC20:3DCE:4DAC:3C72 talk block log suppressed user contributions logs edit filter log vandal log
- 15:28, 9 October 2024 diff hist +307 Talk:Child sexual abuse
- 15:25, 9 October 2024 diff hist +466 Talk:Child sexual abuse →Objection: new section
- 15:09, 9 October 2024 diff hist -187 Child sexual abuse Just because it's in a newspaper, doesn't mean that it isn't capable of baiting those who target and harm minors. And just because this wiki isn't censored, doesn't mean that not censoring the wiki isn't harmful. Tag: Section blanking