There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
For 2804:14C:5B72:856C:D864:B6A0:392A:881F talk block log suppressed user contributions logs edit filter log vandal log
- 04:49, 29 December 2020 diff hist +281 Talk:Modern Monetary Theory →On 2804:14c:5b72:856c:d864:b6a0:392a:881f additions which are being edit warred
- 03:53, 29 December 2020 diff hist +1,344 Modern Monetary Theory →MMT vs other Post-Keynesian schools: Ok, better this way? If you don't agree with the edition, go to the discussion page, I'm eager to listen to what you have to say, just don't try to delete what you don't like in an arbitrary way.
- 03:49, 29 December 2020 diff hist +598 Modern Monetary Theory It is a fact. I'm not saying Post-Keynesian economics is wrong, I'm saying it's fringe because, well, it is. It's not mainstream, just like Austrian School isn't. If you don't like it, go to the discussion page.
- 03:43, 29 December 2020 diff hist +599 Modern Monetary Theory It does because it shows how he's the most important Post-Keynesian according to RePEc. There's no reason to remove his quote as well. Also, Post-Keynesian economics is fringe. The only Post-Keynesian economist that teaches in large a center is Chang.
- 01:35, 29 December 2020 diff hist +1,239 Modern Monetary Theory →MMT vs other Post-Keynesian schools
- 18:05, 28 December 2020 diff hist +794 Modern Monetary Theory →Relevance of the theory