User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 18:34, 8 May 2012 diff hist -68 Talk:Ufology →but... but...
- 18:32, 8 May 2012 diff hist +795 m Talk:Ufology →but... but...
- 17:43, 8 May 2012 diff hist +11 Talk:Ufology →but... but...
- 17:43, 8 May 2012 diff hist +483 m Talk:Ufology →A potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles? 05/08/12
- 17:26, 8 May 2012 diff hist -74 m Talk:Ufology →A potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles? 05/08/12
- 17:15, 8 May 2012 diff hist -127 Talk:Ufology →A potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles? 05/08/12
- 17:03, 8 May 2012 diff hist +4,144 Talk:Ufology →A potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles? 05/08/12
- 16:58, 8 May 2012 diff hist -37 Talk:Ufology →A potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles? 05/08/12
- 16:57, 8 May 2012 diff hist -3,405 Talk:Ufology Double post removed
- 16:46, 8 May 2012 diff hist +1 Talk:Ufology →I must be seeing things, or this is indeed a potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles?
- 16:45, 8 May 2012 diff hist +9 Talk:Ufology →I must be seeing things, or this is indeed a potential pseudo-skeptic article? Isn't Rational Wiki is supposed to contain rational articles?
- 16:40, 8 May 2012 diff hist +3,405 Talk:Ufology →I must be seeing things, or this is indeed a pseudo-skeptic nest? 08-05-12: new section
- 16:39, 8 May 2012 diff hist +3,396 Talk:Ufology →I must be seeing things, or this is indeed a pseudo-skeptic nest?: new section
- 16:17, 8 May 2012 diff hist -2 Ufology It's clear that the opinions exposed are intended to ridicule and to generalize the behavior of those known as ufologists, with a lot of claims that require sources, very rational...