|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 01:09, 30 August 2015 diff hist +735 Cryonics →Non-humans: I see nothing about 'a few in thousands', reading the cited PDF; actually, why is this being cited at all? pinewood nematodes are not c. elegans... let me rescue this with actual rate
- 00:53, 30 August 2015 diff hist 0 Cryonics →Non-humans: also, it was 2015, not 2014; this year, not last year. (it was submitted in Oct 2014 but not accepted until April 2015, and citations are always to acceptance/publication)
- 00:51, 30 August 2015 diff hist -24 Cryonics →Non-humans: that's just a misunderstanding of their policy of posting online preprints; see http://www.liebertpub.com/forauthors/rejuvenation-research/127/
- 23:23, 31 December 2012 diff hist +514 Talk:LessWrong →Does Yvain believe in cryonics?: although how strong an inductive argument will obviously depend on specific numbers; and real-world surveys of cryonics supporters would show the opposite of my made-up example,
- 23:18, 31 December 2012 diff hist +512 Talk:LessWrong →Any idea what's going on here?: +cm
- 23:17, 31 December 2012 diff hist +329 Talk:LessWrong →LW 2012 survey results: +cm
- 19:09, 9 June 2012 diff hist +87 N User:Gwern about me current
- 18:02, 9 June 2012 diff hist +224 LessWrong →The bad: is it really that annoying if noone ever uses them? I mean, 'requiredism' is a terrible example: EY uses it once or twice, and the only other mentions are criticism of it!
- 17:58, 9 June 2012 diff hist +236 LessWrong →The bad: 'somewhat different'?
- 17:47, 9 June 2012 diff hist +277 LessWrong →Local beliefs and tropes: is this article about LessWrong, or Eliezer Yudkowsky? I suggest you make up your mind.